Brake pads ATE or OEM Mazda

OEM Mazda Brake pads
ScareKid
  • Braking:
Rating 4.0

Reviewing the Carfax, it was a rental car for about 50k and then it was a personal car for the next 53k. Both seem to have kept up with maintenance decently as far as oil and filter changes go, but not much else. I didn't see any rust on the bottom, it drives smooth, suspension still seems good, and the dealership replaced the brakes (and put nitrogen in tires so the car goes 1000000x faster).

Pros: drives smooth, suspension good
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 165752 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads

I do my own work at times and replaced brakes and rotors on my car for less than $200 in parts in about three hours of work. if I’d worked smarter it would’ve been two.

Pros: less than $200 parts
Cons: three hours of work
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads

I love my 2017 Yaris IA, really a Mazda 2 made in Mexico, now at 180k miles and still purring like a kitten. No part failures, just front brake pads

Pros: purring like a kitten
Cons: front brake pads
Vehicle: Mazda 2
Mileage: 289682 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads

OEM ceramic brake pads can last 60k to 90k miles.. But they're not that expensive if you change them yourself. Very easy on Mazda, best changed at about 50k miles of normal driving, before they wear too much more, to keep quality OEM rotors for longer.

Pros: easy to change
Cons: cheap replacements won't last
Vehicle: Mazda 2
Mileage: 80467 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads
jensonaj
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

I bought my car in 2020, its a 2015 Mazda. Bought it with 92,000 miles currently has 118,000. At this point I have had break pads replaced twice [last time in the beginning of 2024] and rotors replaced once [in 2022]. I took my car to a mechanic in December 2024 and he said breaks looked fine [took it in for another issue]. In May 2025 the car started making a squeaking noise when breaking. I know I should have brought it in then but I am flat broke, I had no money to spend. I have been driving it like that since then. The car runs fine otherwise, I have no problem with breaking [no input lag] and no vibrations on the break pedal.

Pros: car runs fine, no vibrations
Cons: squeaking noise when breaking
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 118000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads
miniCotulla
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 3.0

Meiner Erfahrung nach bremst das genauso gut wie andere Bremsen, das Problem ist nach 10tkm sportlicher Fahrweise sind Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer, normale Fahrweise max 20tkm. Felgen Kohlschwarz weil nat\u00fcrlich mega viel Bremsstaub in kurzer Zeit.

Pros: bremst genauso gut
Cons: Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads
AlexKotz
  • Braking:
Rating 1.0

Cx5 2024, one year old and the brakes are completely shot and need to be replaced. I was quoted like 1.5k and the manufacturer only offered $500 discount on the new brakes. I’m honestly appalled.

Cons: brakes completely shot
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which brake pads to choose — ATE or OEM Mazda?

If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare brake pads across these categories:

Comparison of brake pads ATE and OEM Mazda
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which brake pads are better — OEM Mazda or ATE?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall better than OEM Mazda.

  1. ATE received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and OEM Mazda scored 64 points.
  2. ATE ranked 11 in the overall ranking, and OEM Mazda ranked 29.
  3. The average rating is higher for ATE (4.2) than for OEM Mazda (3.4).
  4. Brake pads ATE have better feature ratings than OEM Mazda:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for ATE is better than OEM Mazda.
    • Braking - drivers claim, that this property for ATE is outperforms OEM Mazda.
    • Dust - reviews suggest, that this property for ATE is preferred to OEM Mazda.

Which brake pads are more popular — ATE or OEM Mazda?

Brake pads ATE and OEM Mazda were equally popular according to data in March 2026.

By vote balance, brake pads ATE surpassed OEM Mazda:

  • For ATE, the ratio of positive (154) to negative (22) votes is 132 votes.
  • For OEM Mazda, the ratio of positive (124) to negative (67) votes is 57 votes.

By number of reviews, brake pads OEM Mazda surpassed ATE:

Which brake pads do car owners prefer — ATE or OEM Mazda?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads ATE led more car-specific ratings than OEM Mazda:

ATE are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M4, Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Polo, and others.

OEM Mazda are chosen by owners of cars such as: Mazda 2, and others.

Other comparisons of brake pads

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of brake pads ATE with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

Also available: comparisons of brake pads OEM Mazda with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.

Loading...