Brake pads ATE or OEM Mazda

ATE Brake pads
Agitated_Line_2853
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
  • Dust:
Rating 4.0

OEM brake pads from Audi are mostly good for day to day braking, and some sporty, but not daily very aggressive driving. But they do a lot of dust and noise sometimes. I found the solution to be just change the pads for "ATE Ceramic" if you don't use your car to do track days and very frequent sporty driving. These don't have ceramic components, it's mostly marketing, but they do have two good characteristics from Ceramic pads, mostly zero noise when heated and almost zero dust! And the low dust it produces, it's not black. Breaking power it's maybe a little better coming from OEM, but nothing crazy. Do not use sport discs with ATE Ceramic, the brand actually advises to use normal discs with these.

Pros: low dust, low noise
Cons: less breaking power
Vehicle: Audi A4
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads
pixbabysok
  • Braking:
Rating 4.5

Im late to this but ill chime in anyways.

Mine is a 2008 AWD GT with every option. Mileage is 130k. And I run on Regular gas.

By todays standards its a gas guzzler, and even thirsty in 2008, but CRVs werent hugely better.

Ive done nothing to it. Still on original brake pads. And recently replaced the rear wheel bearings.

I dont know why im so lucky except that i do oil changes frequently.

One thing about driving older cars is they arent narcing your driving habits to Mazda. Good to know about insurance.

Since it is top line, it has the Bose system which is decent, but i replaced the head so i could get Bluetooth.

I sincerely believe this car has at least 5 years life left in it.

Pros: reliable, long lasting
Cons: gas guzzler
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 130000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads

Brakes feel fine when driving, but after they cool and I go out again, the pedal feels spongey. A few hard stabs and it returns to normal, until I come in and let it cool. No fade while driving, and pads survived despite having been on the car for over 2 years of road use, although they need replacing now really.

Pros: good braking while driving
Cons: spongey pedal when cool
Part number: TYP 200
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads
PhilHVW
  • Braking:
Rating 3.0

Surprisingly, it needed brake pads and rotors at 21k miles, and at $1,100 at a trusted local mechanic, it wasn't as cheap as I expected. When I bought the car with 1,400 miles on it, the piano black trim inside the car was already scratched, and it looks quite a bit worse now. I also have to echo the thin paint comments from above, I've never seen a car that scratches so easily. The car's manners on the highway at 70 mph+ are a little nervous for me. On the plus side, I've always enjoyed the way the car looks and drives around town. The interior does look way better than the original MSRP would suggest (even with scratches). And we've had no surprising issues, other than the early brake job.

Pros: enjoyed the way car looks
Cons: thin paint, scratches easily
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Mileage: 33796 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Mazda Brake pads
TheSaSQuatCh
  • Braking:
  • Noise:
Rating 1.0

I put OEM Brakes on my ‘19 3 GT AWD. I’m 20K KM into them, and they pulse like mad when I brake above 90KM/h. Absolute fucking trash. The factory brakes also did this, above 90KM, but started around 50K into their life.

Cons: pulsating brakes, poor quality
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 12

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...