Ironman and milemaker are the last two sets and they lasted about 75% of what a premium brand would.
Cons: shorter lifespan
Reviews of IRONMAN tires
PR Score
?
Shows the percentage of positive votes. Learn more in the help
81 votes
Average rating
?
The average rating is calculated only from review ratings, without votes
Description
Share:
I'm in ironman gen 2 from tire discounters all 4, i got all the tires and the mount and a alignment and balancing for like 400$ bucks with the deal they run. And a free oil change. But the ironmans have done me well they did good in rain and snow and i haven't exactly been nice to them, handled potholes too.
Pros: good in rain and snow
Ironman is a value line. They are not awful, also not outstanding. Wet traction and winter traction are not gonna be their strength.
Cons: poor wet, winter traction
Money forced my hand a couple summers back and I had to put new front tires on my Grand Marquis at the time. Had to go cheap and bought Ironman iMove all seasons. After a few months the only positives on the ledger were that a) they had tread and b) oddly, they balanced out unbelievably well. 80 MPH on the highway, smooth as glass. Ride and handling quality deteriorated quickly from new and they got loud in a hurry.
Pros: balanced well, smooth at speed
Cons: deteriorated quickly, got loud
An ultra-high-performance all-season tire, the iMove Gen 3 A/S from Ironman is designed for use on sport and performance-oriented coupes and sedans. Built with large shoulders that improve cornering and handling, the iMove Gen 3 A/S features an all-season rubber compound that allows for solid traction in dry, wet, and light winter weather conditions.
Pros: solid traction, quiet ride
This tire is new Iron Man. This is the second chunk missing; the other tire was replaced under warranty. It’s new, maybe 2 months old.
Cons: chunks missing, warranty replacement
I thought they must be crap but after looking into them, they are very well-reviewed. A traction A temp, UHP (ultra-high performance) rated. I like them. You could pay $400/tire for a premium brand but they won't be 4 times better or last 4 times longer.
Pros: very well-reviewed, traction A temp, UHP rated, good value
I stretch 225/35/19 Ironman Gen 2s on 9.5 wides, they seem like they have more stretch to give too.
Pros: good stretch potential
Ive had ironmans and they were good. Ive had sailuns that were good. Right now i have a car that has 5 yr old Solar brand tires and ive put about 80000mi on.
Pros: good, will do fine
Mileage: 128747 km
Ironmans are garbage. Slipped in any kind of wet weather
Cons: slipped in wet weather
Write your review about tires IRONMAN
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Other tires
Popular IRONMAN parts
What we know about IRONMAN tires
The brand is registered in Australia. Official website: https://ironman4x4.global.
In March 2026, PartReview users have a mixed opinion of IRONMAN tires.
PR Score — 66 out of 100, based on 25 reviews and 81 vote. 14 positive reviews, 6 neutral reviews, 5 negative reviews. Average rating — 3.2 (out of 5). Vote balance: 54 up, 27 down.
In the ranking of the best tires this part is at position 39, behind Tesla and OEM Volkswagen , but ahead of Barum and OEM Honda.
Users also evaluated the qualities of IRONMAN tires:
- Grip - starts, stops, and cornering feel confident on dry and wet roads - rated ambivalently. 2.9 points out of 5.
- Noise - hum or roar in the cabin varies with road surface and speed - rated negatively. 1 point out of 5.
- Ride comfort - bumps and vibrations are absorbed more or less smoothly - rated ambivalently. 2.7 points out of 5.
Tires IRONMAN in car-specific ratings
Other car-specific ratings this part participates in:
- IRONMAN ranks #20 for: Honda Accord .
Tires IRONMAN in comparisons
There are 65 comparisons of IRONMAN tires with other manufacturers on PartReview.
In particular, see which tires are better: IRONMAN or OEM Porsche, IRONMAN or OEM Subaru, IRONMAN or Hifly, OEM Chevrolet or IRONMAN, OEM Audi or IRONMAN .