Brake pads ATE or Carbotech
For normal driving I'd recommend either ATE Ceramic pads, paired with ATE, painted or coated discs.
Get Ate ceramic. never (almost never) have to wash your wheels again
Brakes and hoses ATE.
I had the same problem with my c8 z51, I switched to the Carbotech 1521 pads and they solved the problem. Would definitely recommend
I had an issue with severe brake dust from the OEM pads on my Z06 Corvette. I replaced the pads with Carbotech 1521s and the dust was eliminated. Made a huge difference with keeping the wheels clean and the pads preformed better.
I also suggest you to buy ATE or TRW pads, because cheap stuff might squeak.
If you’ve still got UFO fronts the part number for pads is ATE 602847 (13.0460-2847.2)
Meiner Erfahrung nach bremst das genauso gut wie andere Bremsen, das Problem ist nach 10tkm sportlicher Fahrweise sind Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer, normale Fahrweise max 20tkm. Felgen Kohlschwarz weil nat\u00fcrlich mega viel Bremsstaub in kurzer Zeit.
im running XP10s... so far this set up is amazing, the braking is strong initial bite with little fade. Just take in consideration that this Carbotech pads are modular which means you will have a slight longer pedal travel than normal. And yes they are super noisy, when i drive it on the street i try to be careful with my braking and not feather the brakes, that will make then literally screech and grind the rotors, instead i try to brake a bit harder than usual to get a good bite and then let go of the brake once i stoped (put the car in neutral most of the time or creep forward little by little to releave some heat).
Hatte mal teure ATE Bremsen die sofort verrostet sind. Nie wieder.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Which brake pads to choose — ATE or Carbotech?
If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare brake pads across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which brake pads are better — Carbotech or ATE?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Carbotech were overall better than ATE.
- ATE received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and Carbotech scored 91 point.
- ATE ranked 11 in the overall ranking, and Carbotech ranked 8.
- The average rating is higher for Carbotech (4.2) than for Carbotech (4.2).
Which brake pads are more popular — ATE or Carbotech?
In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads Carbotech were overall more popular than ATE.
By vote balance, brake pads Carbotech surpassed ATE:
- For ATE, the ratio of positive (154) to negative (22) votes is 132 votes.
- For Carbotech, the ratio of positive (274) to negative (25) votes is 249 votes.
By number of reviews, brake pads Carbotech surpassed ATE:
- For brake pads ATE there are 56 reviews: 46 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative.
- For brake pads Carbotech there are 97 reviews: 86 positive, 8 neutral, 3 negative.
Which brake pads do car owners prefer — ATE or Carbotech?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, these manufacturers led the same number of car-specific ratings:
ATE are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M4, Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Polo, and others.
Carbotech are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M2, Chevrolet Corvette, Honda S2000, and others.
Other comparisons of brake pads
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of brake pads ATE with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Mintex.
Also available: comparisons of brake pads Carbotech with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Mintex.
You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.