Tires

Owner reviews for tires

Manufacturers
OEM Audi Tires

I'm at about 50k on a audi Q4 awd and outside of resetting the inspection light ever 10k miles, washer fluid monthly, and tires at 40k.

Pros: replaced tires
Vehicle: Audi
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Tesla Tires

Burned through my stock tires super fast. They lasted 16k miles. Got me some Michelin CrossClimate IIs and they still look almost brand new, even after 35k additional miles.

Pros: long lasting tires
Cons: stock tires wore quickly
Mileage: 35000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Tesla Tires

I've just fitted my third set of tyres. First two sets lasted 36k and 45k (km).

Pros: replaced tires
Mileage: 45000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
OEM Peugeot Tires

So far only the front tires ( I drove a bit reckless the first few months…) new wiper blades and cabin filter, car is 5 years old and barely 40.000km it’s mainly used as a 2nd car.

Pros: new tires
Vehicle: Peugeot
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
GataPapa
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

I just put Michelin ePrimacy all season EV tires on my Model Y. They are more efficient than the OEM Continentals and should last longer.

Pros: more efficient, should last longer
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
VITOUR Tires
WRRide
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I switched from cup2's to vitour's on my 981 gt4 and have no complaints. They last longer and I think they more consistent than the cup2's.

Pros: last longer, more consistent
Vehicle: Porsche
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Vredestein Tires
liam821
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

My initial impression of the Vredesteins was, "Holy cow, the rear end is going to swap places with the front." The car wagged and bobbed all over the road. It was scary. After a short 5-mile drive home, I adjusted the tire pressure to 41 psi in the rear (they were at 40 and 45 left/right) and drove around a bit more to break in the tires. Once broken in, they drove much better.

Going straight they're fine and don't notice too much difference between the old EP500s and the new Vredesteins. Maybe the ride is slightly better due to the Vredesteins’ softer sidewall. Noise is about the same—they’re quiet tires.

We get a lot of rain here, and the Vredesteins are great in the wet. They’re better than the stock EP500s, likely due to their less aggressive tread pattern and greater tread depth.

However, corners are where it all falls apart. The initial turn-in is great because the front EP500s, despite their poor tire life, handle well. But there’s a slight delay as the rear wobbles into the corner. You can feel the car load up, and you have to counter-steer slightly to keep the car in line as the rear flops over. While the Vredesteins have good grip, the side/slip angle is so large during aggressive driving that the traction control freaks out in fast corners. When you straighten out, the rear flops back and wobbles a bit.

My wife texted me on her way to work this morning, saying, "The car is wiggling so much I think I might throw up."

Any type of turning has the rear bobbling and wagging around. Bumps in the road will also cause it to bounce around. It's just not a pleasant experience whatsoever.

After driving on them for a while, I’m considering whether running Vredesteins on the front as well might correct some of the handling issues.

Pros: great in the wet
Cons: wobbles in corners
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I had weather peaks for one week in Alaska and one exploaded on the parks hwy in the fall. So far

Not impressed on ice.

Cons: exploaded on highway
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review about tires

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Loading...