Tires Kumho or BFGoodrich
Swapped the 21’s and summer tires off my summit reserve for 18” XDs and Kumho Venture with a 3 peak mountain snowflake rating. Had 10” of snow and didn’t bat an eye in snow mode.
Kumho - superior value and great handling.
I've stuck with my BF Goodrich Comp A/S 2+. They stick like glue in all weather and dont make any road noise.
Kumho ecsta sport S. Huge improvement
I got 275 and use to have pirellis now I got kumhos they don’t spin as much as the pirellis from a straight dig I use to fish tail hard when my foot was deep in the pedal I recommend kumhos and falkens they straight
Try kumho tires korean brand and decent quality for its price, for my sedan its about 2.8k per tire
On my last car Michelin Pilot Sport 4S lasted ~20k but that's kind of expected due to how soft they are. On my current I have Kumho Ecsta Sport and they have lasted about the same but instead of wear being the issue they're cracking/tearing.
wife has Michelin Defenders on hers. I put BF Goodrich all terrain ta on mine.
I absolutely hate using the KO2's. They're a long lasting tire with a high load rating, but that's because the rubber compound is hard as steel. They're outright dangerous in wet and icy conditions.
Worn KO2s are known to have lots of siping, but for some reason the siping doesn\u2019t go all the way down and they\u2019re known for getting pretty bad in the wet/snow vs some other off road tires.
Write your review
Help others - share your experience with this part.
Which tires to choose — Kumho or BFGoodrich?
If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.
We compare tires across these categories:
- PR Score.
- Overall ranking.
- Vote balance.
- Average rating.
- Number of reviews.
- Feature ratings.
- Car owners’ choice.
Which tires are better — BFGoodrich or Kumho?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Kumho were overall better than BFGoodrich.
- Kumho received a PR Score of 73 out of 100, and BFGoodrich scored 76 points.
- Kumho ranked 14 in the overall ranking, and BFGoodrich ranked 16.
- The average rating is higher for BFGoodrich (3.8) than for Kumho (3.7).
-
Tires BFGoodrich have better feature ratings than Kumho:
- Noise - owners believe, that this property for Kumho is better than BFGoodrich.
- Grip - drivers claim, that this property for BFGoodrich is outperforms Kumho.
- Ride comfort - reviews suggest, that by this property Kumho does not differ from BFGoodrich.
Which tires are more popular — Kumho or BFGoodrich?
In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Kumho were overall more popular than BFGoodrich.
By vote balance, tires Kumho surpassed BFGoodrich:
- For Kumho, the ratio of positive (972) to negative (354) votes is 618 votes.
- For BFGoodrich, the ratio of positive (798) to negative (246) votes is 552 votes.
By number of reviews, tires Kumho surpassed BFGoodrich:
- For tires Kumho there are 421 review: 280 positive, 66 neutral, 74 negative.
- For tires BFGoodrich there are 334 reviews: 238 positive, 42 neutral, 54 negative.
Which tires do car owners prefer — Kumho or BFGoodrich?
In March 2026, according to PartReview, these manufacturers led the same number of car-specific ratings:
Kumho are chosen by owners of cars such as: Volvo 850, Audi A8, Kia Sportage, and others.
BFGoodrich are chosen by owners of cars such as: Chevrolet Silverado, Chevrolet Suburban, Toyota Sequoia, and others.
Other comparisons of tires
If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.
For example, comparisons of tires Kumho with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
Also available: comparisons of tires BFGoodrich with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.
You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.