Tires YOKOHAMA or BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich Tires

Stock Pirellis were getting a little low after about 35,000 miles and decided to upgrade a bit. Went with KO2s 245/65/17. Love the fitment even more. They’re slightly wider than the stock 225s. Make a huge difference off-road and feels more like a truck when driving.

Pros: huge difference off-road
Cons: wore out pretty quick
Mileage: 35000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

Your KO2s/KO3s are excellent tires, you don't need any other tires for a 3 mile drive. They are 3PMS tires and perform well on ice among AT tires.

Pros: excellent tires, perform well
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Since you’re dedicating this set purely for HPDE and want something that survives endurance-style sessions without overheating or chunking, the Yokohama Advan Neova AD09 is the best pick among everything you listed. It holds grip longer than PS4S, it’s far more heat-resistant than the Continental Sport 02, and unlike the RT660, it doesn’t fall off a cliff halfway through a session. Perfect match for a VA STI on stock power and mild camber.

Pros: holds grip longer
Cons: price is high
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Never had a Yokohama tire last more than 30k miles on three different vehicles, so I won’t be buying them again.

Cons: poor mileage
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

I absolutely hate using the KO2's. They're a long lasting tire with a high load rating, but that's because the rubber compound is hard as steel. They're outright dangerous in wet and icy conditions.

Pros: long lasting tire
Cons: dangerous in wet/icy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 88

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which tires to choose — YOKOHAMA or BFGoodrich?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires YOKOHAMA and BFGoodrich
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — BFGoodrich or YOKOHAMA?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA were overall better than BFGoodrich.

  1. YOKOHAMA received a PR Score of 82 out of 100, and BFGoodrich scored 76 points.
  2. YOKOHAMA ranked 6 in the overall ranking, and BFGoodrich ranked 16.
  3. The average rating is higher for YOKOHAMA (4) than for BFGoodrich (3.8).
  4. Tires YOKOHAMA have better feature ratings than BFGoodrich:
    • Grip - owners believe, that by this property YOKOHAMA does not differ from BFGoodrich.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for YOKOHAMA is outperforms BFGoodrich.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for YOKOHAMA is preferred to BFGoodrich.

Which tires are more popular — YOKOHAMA or BFGoodrich?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA were overall more popular than BFGoodrich.

By vote balance, tires YOKOHAMA surpassed BFGoodrich:

  • For YOKOHAMA, the ratio of positive (1371) to negative (288) votes is 1083 votes.
  • For BFGoodrich, the ratio of positive (798) to negative (246) votes is 552 votes.

By number of reviews, tires YOKOHAMA surpassed BFGoodrich:

  • For tires YOKOHAMA there are 539 reviews: 429 positive, 42 neutral, 68 negative.
  • For tires BFGoodrich there are 334 reviews: 238 positive, 42 neutral, 54 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — YOKOHAMA or BFGoodrich?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA led more car-specific ratings than BFGoodrich:

YOKOHAMA are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M2, Dodge Dakota, Porsche Cayenne, Skoda Octavia, Suzuki Swift, Jeep Compass, Nissan Pathfinder, Toyota Celica, Toyota Fortuner, Toyota MR2, Volkswagen Beetle, and others.

BFGoodrich are chosen by owners of cars such as: Chevrolet Silverado, Chevrolet Suburban, Toyota Sequoia, and others.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires YOKOHAMA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, Toyo, Kumho.

Also available: comparisons of tires BFGoodrich with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, Toyo, Kumho.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...