Tires BFGoodrich or Nokia

Nokia Tires

If anyone needs quiet winter tires, I just got a set of Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5s, and they’re as quiet as my summer Michelin Pilot Sports. They’re astounding, especially compared with the R3s I used to have.

Pros: quiet, astounding performance
Cons: compared with R3s
Vehicle: Lexus IS
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
shilent1
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I'm experiencing the same. Had mines for a week now in 285/75R17 E load on a GMC Canyon AT4X. Replaced the stock tires Wrangler Territory MT 285/70R17 C Load.

Discount Tire inflated them to 36. Now have them at 31.

Because of its slight donut shape, it makes the tire look skinny.

Pros: tread wider than stock
Cons: slight donut shape, looks skinny
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Last year I used the factory AT 20s. Traction in snow was ok, but lateral control was absolute garbage. I didn’t feel confident at all.

Pros: traction in snow ok
Cons: lateral control garbage
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 104

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which tires to choose — BFGoodrich or Nokia?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires BFGoodrich and Nokia
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — Nokia or BFGoodrich?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Nokia were overall better than BFGoodrich.

  1. BFGoodrich received a PR Score of 76 out of 100, and Nokia scored 87 points.
  2. BFGoodrich ranked 16 in the overall ranking, and Nokia ranked 4.
  3. The average rating is higher for Nokia (4.3) than for BFGoodrich (3.8).
  4. Tires Nokia have better feature ratings than BFGoodrich:
    • Grip - owners believe, that this property for Nokia is better than BFGoodrich.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that by this property BFGoodrich does not differ from Nokia.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that by this property BFGoodrich does not differ from Nokia.

Which tires are more popular — BFGoodrich or Nokia?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Nokia were overall more popular than BFGoodrich.

By vote balance, tires Nokia surpassed BFGoodrich:

  • For BFGoodrich, the ratio of positive (798) to negative (246) votes is 552 votes.
  • For Nokia, the ratio of positive (1876) to negative (268) votes is 1608 votes.

By number of reviews, tires Nokia surpassed BFGoodrich:

  • For tires BFGoodrich there are 334 reviews: 238 positive, 42 neutral, 54 negative.
  • For tires Nokia there are 703 reviews: 600 positive, 38 neutral, 64 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — BFGoodrich or Nokia?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires BFGoodrich led more car-specific ratings than Nokia:

BFGoodrich are chosen by owners of cars such as: Chevrolet Silverado, Chevrolet Suburban, Toyota Sequoia, and others.

Nokia are chosen by owners of cars such as: Ford Escape, Honda Ridgeline, and others.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires BFGoodrich with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo, Kumho.

Also available: comparisons of tires Nokia with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo, Kumho.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...