Tires Falken or RIKEN

Falken Tires

Have about 2-3 foot of snow in Eastern NC today (still falling) and snow mode did fantastic on my WK2 with Wildpeak AT3W’s

Pros: snow mode did fantastic
Vehicle: Jeep
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I put Falken Aklimates on the 20's on my baby mom's. They are beyond awesome. I had to go to work this past Sunday during the worst of the snow (we got 14" by that evening when I left) and it made it through without a hiccup.

Can't recommend them enough.

Pros: beyond awesome
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN Tires

Tires like the Riken Raptor are a soft tire and performance minded, but not full on track tire (300tw). They perform quite well, but at the same time, are dirt cheap.

Pros: perform quite well
Cons: not full on track
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
TallCracker69
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

Falken AT4W’s are absolute tanks, loving them so far. They also look much more aggressive than they feel or sound which is a win win for aesthetics / highway

Pros: aggressive look, loving them
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
Square_Photo_7041
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I\u2019ve never ever been let down by a set of falken wildpeak at3ws. All season tire so you don\u2019t have to have a dedicated set. Very smooth on the highway for an at tire, available in 10 ply for towing or extreme use, little extra meat on them for when you do go off-road and do fantastic in the snow.

Pros: smooth, fantastic in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
FuknBreadCrumbs
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

I’m using Falken Azenis. I was planning on Michelin pilot sports, but tariffs added almost $200 per tire so I went with Falkens from the stock Pirelli P Zeros.

What I’ve noticed:

Steering feel is noticeably worse. I noticed instantly. Honestly that doesn’t matter with a muscle car, but I liked the direct feel and confidence of the pirellis.

However, the new ride is nicer. Ride is slightly more comfortable, which for a daily driver is a valid trade off. Ride went from 4/10 to a 5/10 in comfort.

If the Pirellis grip at normal temperatures is an 8/10 the falkens are maybe 6.9/10. I’ve only had them for 200 miles so far though.

My pirellis needed to be replaced after 8k miles on the street. The falkens should last 30-40k miles. Oh and the pirellis turned in to glass below 50 Fahrenheit since they’re summer tires. I’m definitely going to try Michelins next, no matter the price, but I’m not upset at cheaping out ($320 a tire) this time.

Pros: more comfortable ride
Cons: worse steering feel
Vehicle: Dodge
Mileage: 322 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I’m a little disappointed in the Mav (FWD hybrid) snow performance. Even got real nice Falken Wildpeak AT3 all-terrains in August since the factory continentals were dogshit. It gets by alright enough but still slips on acceleration. A lot.

Cons: slips on acceleration
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 94

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which tires to choose — Falken or RIKEN?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires Falken and RIKEN
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — RIKEN or Falken?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Falken were overall better than RIKEN.

  1. Falken received a PR Score of 81 out of 100, and RIKEN scored 71 point.
  2. Falken ranked 3 in the overall ranking, and RIKEN ranked 55.
  3. The average rating is higher for Falken (4) than for RIKEN (3.6).
  4. Tires Falken have better feature ratings than RIKEN:
    • Grip - owners believe, that this property for Falken is better than RIKEN.
    • Noise - drivers claim, that this property for Falken is outperforms RIKEN.
    • Ride comfort - reviews suggest, that this property for RIKEN is preferred to Falken.

Which tires are more popular — Falken or RIKEN?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Falken were overall more popular than RIKEN.

By vote balance, tires Falken surpassed RIKEN:

  • For Falken, the ratio of positive (2317) to negative (535) votes is 1782 votes.
  • For RIKEN, the ratio of positive (35) to negative (14) votes is 21 vote.

By number of reviews, tires Falken surpassed RIKEN:

  • For tires Falken there are 925 reviews: 719 positive, 80 neutral, 125 negative.
  • For tires RIKEN there are 15 reviews: 9 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — Falken or RIKEN?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires Falken led more car-specific ratings than RIKEN:

Falken are chosen by owners of cars such as: Jeep Cherokee, Land Rover Defender, Ford Fiesta, Honda Fit, Jeep Wrangler, Toyota 4runner, Volkswagen Corrado, and others.

Tires RIKEN have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires Falken with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo, Kumho.

Also available: comparisons of tires RIKEN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo, Kumho.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...