Tires Nokia or RIKEN

RIKEN Tires

Tires like the Riken Raptor are a soft tire and performance minded, but not full on track tire (300tw). They perform quite well, but at the same time, are dirt cheap.

Pros: perform quite well
Cons: not full on track
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

If anyone needs quiet winter tires, I just got a set of Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5s, and they’re as quiet as my summer Michelin Pilot Sports. They’re astounding, especially compared with the R3s I used to have.

Pros: quiet, astounding performance
Cons: compared with R3s
Vehicle: Lexus IS
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
shilent1
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I'm experiencing the same. Had mines for a week now in 285/75R17 E load on a GMC Canyon AT4X. Replaced the stock tires Wrangler Territory MT 285/70R17 C Load.

Discount Tire inflated them to 36. Now have them at 31.

Because of its slight donut shape, it makes the tire look skinny.

Pros: tread wider than stock
Cons: slight donut shape, looks skinny
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 72

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which tires to choose — Nokia or RIKEN?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires Nokia and RIKEN
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — RIKEN or Nokia?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Nokia were overall better than RIKEN.

  1. Nokia received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and RIKEN scored 71 point.
  2. Nokia ranked 4 in the overall ranking, and RIKEN ranked 55.
  3. The average rating is higher for Nokia (4.3) than for RIKEN (3.6).
  4. Tires Nokia have better feature ratings than RIKEN:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for Nokia is better than RIKEN.
    • Grip - drivers claim, that this property for Nokia is outperforms RIKEN.
    • Ride comfort - reviews suggest, that this property for RIKEN is preferred to Nokia.

Which tires are more popular — Nokia or RIKEN?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Nokia were overall more popular than RIKEN.

By vote balance, tires Nokia surpassed RIKEN:

  • For Nokia, the ratio of positive (1876) to negative (268) votes is 1608 votes.
  • For RIKEN, the ratio of positive (35) to negative (14) votes is 21 vote.

By number of reviews, tires Nokia surpassed RIKEN:

  • For tires Nokia there are 703 reviews: 600 positive, 38 neutral, 64 negative.
  • For tires RIKEN there are 15 reviews: 9 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — Nokia or RIKEN?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires Nokia led more car-specific ratings than RIKEN:

Nokia are chosen by owners of cars such as: Ford Escape, Honda Ridgeline, and others.

Tires RIKEN have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires Nokia with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo, Kumho.

Also available: comparisons of tires RIKEN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo, Kumho.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...