Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ Kumho ➔ RIKEN

Tires Kumho or RIKEN

Reviews
All
Kumho
RIKEN
Kumho › Tires
GoH0gsGo
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

Swapped the 21’s and summer tires off my summit reserve for 18” XDs and Kumho Venture with a 3 peak mountain snowflake rating. Had 10” of snow and didn’t bat an eye in snow mode.

Pros: didn’t bat an eye
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN › Tires
Netghod
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

Tires like the Riken Raptor are a soft tire and performance minded, but not full on track tire (300tw). They perform quite well, but at the same time, are dirt cheap.

Pros: perform quite well
Cons: not full on track
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho › Tires
Embarrassed-Table436
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I got 275 and use to have pirellis now I got kumhos they don’t spin as much as the pirellis from a straight dig I use to fish tail hard when my foot was deep in the pedal I recommend kumhos and falkens they straight

Pros: don’t spin as much
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho › Tires
lepickle
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Try kumho tires korean brand and decent quality for its price, for my sedan its about 2.8k per tire

Pros: decent quality for price
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho › Tires
Shmoke_n_Shniff
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

On my last car Michelin Pilot Sport 4S lasted ~20k but that's kind of expected due to how soft they are. On my current I have Kumho Ecsta Sport and they have lasted about the same but instead of wear being the issue they're cracking/tearing.

Cons: cracking/tearing
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho › Tires
David_1993
  • Grip:
Rating 3.0

On my current car I drove kumho tires in the summer and they are pretty decent. Not the best I had but still pretty good.

Pros: pretty decent
Cons: not the best
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho › Tires
APater6076
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

Boils my piss when I see people walking into tyre shops and just asking for the cheapest they have. It vaporises my shit when it's clearly a family car with child seats in the back. Why would you cheap out on keeping your kids safe?

Pros: keeping your kids safe
Cons: budgets can be tight
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho › Tires
ram_87_leo
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

Do not get this. Tire is good enough with handling but it eas worn down to 4/32 within 25k miles. Hp71 was what i had.

Pros: good enough handling
Cons: worn down quickly
Mileage: 40233 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 44

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — Kumho or RIKEN?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires Kumho and RIKEN
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — RIKEN or Kumho?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Kumho were overall better than RIKEN.

  1. Kumho received a PR Score of 73 out of 100, and RIKEN scored 71 point.
  2. Kumho ranked 14 in the overall ranking, and RIKEN ranked 55.
  3. The average rating is higher for Kumho (3.7) than for RIKEN (3.6).
  4. Tires Kumho have better feature ratings than RIKEN:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for Kumho is better than RIKEN.
    • Grip - drivers claim, that this property for RIKEN is outperforms Kumho.
    • Ride comfort - reviews suggest, that this property for RIKEN is preferred to Kumho.

Which tires are more popular — Kumho or RIKEN?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Kumho were overall more popular than RIKEN.

By vote balance, tires Kumho surpassed RIKEN:

  • For Kumho, the ratio of positive (972) to negative (354) votes is 618 votes.
  • For RIKEN, the ratio of positive (35) to negative (14) votes is 21 vote.

By number of reviews, tires Kumho surpassed RIKEN:

  • For tires Kumho there are 421 review: 280 positive, 66 neutral, 74 negative.
  • For tires RIKEN there are 15 reviews: 9 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — Kumho or RIKEN?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires Kumho led more car-specific ratings than RIKEN:

Kumho are chosen by owners of cars such as: Volvo 850, Audi A8, Kia Sportage, and others.

Tires RIKEN have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires Kumho with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

Also available: comparisons of tires RIKEN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›