Tires YOKOHAMA or Nokia

Nokia Tires

If anyone needs quiet winter tires, I just got a set of Nokian Hakkapeliitta R5s, and they’re as quiet as my summer Michelin Pilot Sports. They’re astounding, especially compared with the R3s I used to have.

Pros: quiet, astounding performance
Cons: compared with R3s
Vehicle: Lexus IS
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
shilent1
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I'm experiencing the same. Had mines for a week now in 285/75R17 E load on a GMC Canyon AT4X. Replaced the stock tires Wrangler Territory MT 285/70R17 C Load.

Discount Tire inflated them to 36. Now have them at 31.

Because of its slight donut shape, it makes the tire look skinny.

Pros: tread wider than stock
Cons: slight donut shape, looks skinny
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Never had a Yokohama tire last more than 30k miles on three different vehicles, so I won’t be buying them again.

Cons: poor mileage
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 125

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which tires to choose — YOKOHAMA or Nokia?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires YOKOHAMA and Nokia
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — Nokia or YOKOHAMA?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Nokia were overall better than YOKOHAMA.

  1. YOKOHAMA received a PR Score of 82 out of 100, and Nokia scored 87 points.
  2. YOKOHAMA ranked 6 in the overall ranking, and Nokia ranked 4.
  3. The average rating is higher for Nokia (4.3) than for YOKOHAMA (4).
  4. Tires Nokia have better feature ratings than YOKOHAMA:
    • Grip - owners believe, that this property for Nokia is better than YOKOHAMA.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for YOKOHAMA is outperforms Nokia.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for YOKOHAMA is preferred to Nokia.

Which tires are more popular — YOKOHAMA or Nokia?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Nokia were overall more popular than YOKOHAMA.

By vote balance, tires Nokia surpassed YOKOHAMA:

  • For YOKOHAMA, the ratio of positive (1371) to negative (288) votes is 1083 votes.
  • For Nokia, the ratio of positive (1876) to negative (268) votes is 1608 votes.

By number of reviews, tires Nokia surpassed YOKOHAMA:

  • For tires YOKOHAMA there are 539 reviews: 429 positive, 42 neutral, 68 negative.
  • For tires Nokia there are 703 reviews: 600 positive, 38 neutral, 64 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — YOKOHAMA or Nokia?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA led more car-specific ratings than Nokia:

YOKOHAMA are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M2, Dodge Dakota, Porsche Cayenne, Skoda Octavia, Suzuki Swift, Jeep Compass, Nissan Pathfinder, Toyota Celica, Toyota Fortuner, Toyota MR2, Volkswagen Beetle, and others.

Nokia are chosen by owners of cars such as: Ford Escape, Honda Ridgeline, and others.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires YOKOHAMA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Hankook, Toyo, Kumho, Cooper.

Also available: comparisons of tires Nokia with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Hankook, Toyo, Kumho, Cooper.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...