Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

MICHELIN Tires

They handle great on ice, they cut through deep snow. I didn't skid or slide much, and I didn't get pulled around during lane changes or driving my car across deep ruts.

Pros: handle great on ice
Cons: none
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
dustindh10
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I have Michelin Defender2s on my '19. They are great tires. I don't really see any snow, but they do great in the rain. They ride well, are pretty grippy for all-seasons and handle 80mph on the highway with 0 issues.

Pros: great tires, ride well
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I just upgraded our Crosstrek Hybrid to Cross Climate 2's - They are good all-season touring tires. The stock Falken tires are... meh, and mine didn't seem to last very long.

It's only been a day, but the CC2's are super responsive and the car is a whole lot quieter.

Pros: super responsive, whole lot quieter
Cons: Falken didn't last
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
tlow569
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I have the same vehicle and put Michelin CC2 on it. They're a grip hugging tire and have enjoyed having them on the vehicle. One other tire that I've come across and considering for the future are the Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActive which was tested and outperformed the CC2 on wet roads. However, the CC2 does have a better tread life and wear rate. Can't go wrong with either.

Pros: grip hugging tire
Cons: better on wet roads
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
TheGroundBeef
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Michelin Defender 100%. Cross Climate is a close second. Michelin are expensive for a reason- they’re the best. Fantastic ride quality, durable rubber compound, and most importantly even tread wear. 10x better than the junk OEM Falken or Yokohama tires

Pros: fantastic ride quality, durable rubber
Cons: expensive
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
chrfr
  • Grip:
Rating 3.0

I've used Nokians for years but tried Blizzak WS-90s this time around because they were a fair bit less expensive. They seem fine but seem to have noticeably more rolling resistance than the Nokian, and I notice it's easier to spin them starting up on dry pavement in cold weather than I'd experienced with Nokian in the past. I'll be switching back to whatever Hakkapeliitta is current once these are worn out.

Pros: less expensive
Cons: more rolling resistance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Fantastic_Strategy_2
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Hey, I have a Michelin set from 2018 and they are hard like hockey pucks. I don’t run on them cause I have another set that I’m on.

Cons: hard like hockey pucks
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ... 367

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...