Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

MICHELIN Tires

I live in northern Vermont with a 2021 RWD Standard Range +. I take the car skiing almost every weekend. I never have issues. It does much better than any front wheel car I’ve ever owned.

Pros: better than FWD
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Battlax S22 on a Ninja 650. Makapit. Confidence inspiring pag lean both wet and dry. Subok ko na inakyat ko ng marilaque habang maulan. Been using it since July and happy about it.

Pros: Confidence inspiring
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Blizzak ws90. Had them on my rwd g37 and made it through every winter/snow here in Missouri when I sold the car I kept the wheels&tires for my current car lol

Pros: made it through winter
Vehicle: Infiniti
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Now Bridgestone T32 gamit ko almost half the price ng Michelin around 18k set okay na okay din sya for long rides and wet roads subok ang kapit sa basa.

Pros: okay sya for rides
Cons: almost half the price
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Michelin Pilot Street 2 at ~10k now. Rear is close to getting replaced but there's still some life left. Sunny or stormy, I lean it just the same and I've never felt it losing grip. No problem going over potholes at Quirino.

Pros: never felt losing grip
Cons: Rear close to replaced
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I have Blizzaks and compared to true studded winter tires like Nokian they are not on the same level. But if you dont have ice and snow all the time they have good wet grip.

Pros: good wet grip
Cons: not on same level
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

This looks like to be a Michelin PS 3 or 4. If my guess is correct, these are sport tire which means soft rubber compound, and because of that they degrade (harden) fast. From experience, with normal use, they are good for 2-3 years of driving, then they get horribly bad (hard). Above 4 years they become hard like hockey pucks - the rubber looks shiny with lots of micro cracking and they are (from experience) deadly in the rain. So, judging from the picture one (i see micro cracking) and the fact they are 5 years old: They are gone. Tread depth is irrelevant now. They are so hard that you cant wear them down not even in 100.000km. Btw. about 6-7mm is the tread depth when these (Michelin PS) tires are new.

Pros: good for 2-3 years
Cons: degrade fast, harden quickly, deadly in rain, micro cracking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 ... 367

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...