Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

MICHELIN Tires
Scpdivy
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Just put Defender 2’s on my 18’ Highlander. Bought it with coopers on it. Couldn’t believe how much better the ride is and how much quieter it is.

Pros: better ride, much quieter
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
cellblock73
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Also live in Minnesota. I got the cross climates. Don\u2019t have to change them out, they perform great in winter. Have had them on for 60k miles or so, mostly highway, and they still got a lot of life left.

Pros: perform great in winter, long life
Mileage: 96560 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I went from Toyo Celsius to CC2’s on my 2014 RAV4 Limited, I love them and have had no issues in over a year and 20,000 km of use. I rotate front to rear every 8,000 km during my oil change so they are wearing evenly. I haven’t noticed a big difference in gas mileage or noise.

Pros: no issues, wearing evenly
Cons: no big difference
Vehicle: Toyota
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I thought about CC2's for my Tucson Hybrid with AWD, but went with the Bridgestone WeatherPeak's instead. Didn't notice a mileage hit at all compared to the OEM tires, and they may actually be an improvement. They were a big upgrade in the snow as compared to the OEM tires.

Pros: big upgrade in snow
Cons: no mileage hit
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

We do have CC2's on one of our cars. My personal answer is, no tire is great at everything. CC2's are as good as advertised in snow and rain traction, which is a very valuable trait.

Pros: good snow, rain traction
Cons: not especially quiet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I live in the sf bay area and have cross climate 2s on a camry. They are great for foggy and rainy weather. Also have used them in Tahoe and Donner, california. I like them quite a bit. Great traction for my usage.

Pros: great for foggy, rainy
Cons: they are loud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
MrGentlemanSr
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Will just note my experience as it's been about 1-2k miles: To me, on the road new they are slightly slippery. Can't explain it but I personally don't mind it. This was in 40-50 degree temps before it dropped. Was breezing at 80+ weeks later taking the interstate from one side of PA to the other. 28-35 degrees out. They seem to ride better colder. And lastly, from prior reviews, you will lose about 2 mpg from the tires.

Pros: ride better colder
Cons: slightly slippery, lose mpg
Mileage: 3219 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I’ve run both, the Nokians are the better tire. I genuinely was not impressed with the CC2, snow/ice braking was pathetic.

Pros: Nokians are better tire
Cons: pathetic snow/ice braking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ... 367

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...