Brake pads ATE or Textar

ATE Brake pads

If you’ve still got UFO fronts the part number for pads is ATE 602847 (13.0460-2847.2)

Pros: UFO front pads
Vehicle: Audi 200
Part number: ATE 602847 (13.0460-2847.2)
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads
miniCotulla
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 3.0

Meiner Erfahrung nach bremst das genauso gut wie andere Bremsen, das Problem ist nach 10tkm sportlicher Fahrweise sind Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer, normale Fahrweise max 20tkm. Felgen Kohlschwarz weil nat\u00fcrlich mega viel Bremsstaub in kurzer Zeit.

Pros: bremst genauso gut
Cons: Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads

Textar makes good pads but they get brake dust everywhere. They are currently the stock ones on my 23 m40i.

Pros: good pads
Cons: get brake dust everywhere
Vehicle: BMW X3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads

Well, I just put Textar pads on and am looking to swap them because they\u2019re super dusty and squeal with light pressure, so I too would love some recommendations.

Cons: super dusty, squeal
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 10

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which brake pads to choose — ATE or Textar?

If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare brake pads across these categories:

Comparison of brake pads ATE and Textar
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which brake pads are better — Textar or ATE?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall better than Textar.

  1. ATE received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and Textar scored 74 points.
  2. ATE ranked 11 in the overall ranking, and Textar ranked 22.
  3. The average rating is higher for ATE (4.2) than for Textar (3.8).
  4. Brake pads ATE have better feature ratings than Textar:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for Textar is better than ATE.
    • Braking - drivers claim, that by this property ATE does not differ from Textar.
    • Dust - reviews suggest, that this property for ATE is preferred to Textar.

Which brake pads are more popular — ATE or Textar?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall more popular than Textar.

By vote balance, brake pads ATE surpassed Textar:

  • For ATE, the ratio of positive (154) to negative (22) votes is 132 votes.
  • For Textar, the ratio of positive (104) to negative (35) votes is 69 votes.

By number of reviews, brake pads ATE surpassed Textar:

  • For brake pads ATE there are 56 reviews: 46 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative.
  • For brake pads Textar there are 44 reviews: 30 positive, 7 neutral, 7 negative.

Which brake pads do car owners prefer — ATE or Textar?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads ATE led more car-specific ratings than Textar:

ATE are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M4, Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Polo, and others.

Brake pads Textar have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of brake pads

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of brake pads ATE with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

Also available: comparisons of brake pads Textar with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.

Loading...