Brake pads ATE or Textar

Textar Brake pads
black107
  • Braking:
Rating 4.5

I beat the hell out of some OE Textars in 110+ heat at Buttonwillow and they held up admirably. You don’t need anything more for the street.

Pros: held up well, high heat
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads
adistantrumble
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

I used ATE ceramic pads on my mk7 pp and so far they are great. Barely any dust, no noticeable wear on the rotors after 3k miles, and no extra pedal pressure required.

Pros: low dust, no rotor wear
Mileage: 3000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads
RAM47
  • Braking:
Rating 4.0

stick with ATE or akebono. both good for their price. have ran both on my e39 and they work great with their respective rotors

Pros: good price, work great
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads
bnperrone
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 5.0

FWIW I wound up with those Brembo front and Zimmerman coated rears with ATE ceramic pads and I’m very happy with it. To me the stock setup is grabby at low speeds and these are much smoother. I don’t feel like I’ve lost any stopping power. Huge difference in brake dust.

Pros: much smoother, less brake dust
Cons: stock setup is grabby
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Textar Brake pads

Quality pads and rotors tend not to warp out in a couple hundred miles. If you bought Durlast junk from Autoroo then that's the reason. Stick with OE/OEM Quality like ATE rotors and Textar pads.

Pros: OE/OEM Quality
Cons: Durlast junk
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads

Even the parts prices are on a different level, ie brake pads with a Volvo logo on them - 160€, with ATE (they allegedly produce the original pads too) logo - 60€...

Pros: lower price, same quality
Cons: Volvo logo price high
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 10

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...