Brake pads ATE or GALFER

ATE Brake pads
miniCotulla
  • Braking:
  • Dust:
Rating 3.0

Meiner Erfahrung nach bremst das genauso gut wie andere Bremsen, das Problem ist nach 10tkm sportlicher Fahrweise sind Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer, normale Fahrweise max 20tkm. Felgen Kohlschwarz weil nat\u00fcrlich mega viel Bremsstaub in kurzer Zeit.

Pros: bremst genauso gut
Cons: Bel\u00e4ge und Scheiben leer
Mileage: 10000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
ATE Brake pads

We use ATE here in Germany. Rear brake pads will probably require a diagnostic device to disengage the electrical parking brake.

Cons: requires diagnostic device
Vehicle: Mercedes
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which brake pads to choose — ATE or GALFER?

If choosing brake pads across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare brake pads across these categories:

Comparison of brake pads ATE and GALFER
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which brake pads are better — GALFER or ATE?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall better than GALFER.

  1. ATE received a PR Score of 87 out of 100, and GALFER scored 81 point.
  2. ATE ranked 11 in the overall ranking, and GALFER ranked 32.
  3. The average rating is higher for ATE (4.2) than for GALFER (4.1).
  4. Brake pads ATE have better feature ratings than GALFER:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for ATE is better than GALFER.
    • Braking - drivers claim, that this property for ATE is outperforms GALFER.
    • Dust - reviews suggest, that this property for ATE is preferred to GALFER.

Which brake pads are more popular — ATE or GALFER?

In March 2026 on PartReview, brake pads ATE were overall more popular than GALFER.

By vote balance, brake pads ATE surpassed GALFER:

  • For ATE, the ratio of positive (154) to negative (22) votes is 132 votes.
  • For GALFER, the ratio of positive (27) to negative (6) votes is 21 vote.

By number of reviews, brake pads ATE surpassed GALFER:

  • For brake pads ATE there are 56 reviews: 46 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative.
  • For brake pads GALFER there are 11 reviews: 9 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative.

Which brake pads do car owners prefer — ATE or GALFER?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, brake pads ATE led more car-specific ratings than GALFER:

ATE are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M4, Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Polo, and others.

Brake pads GALFER have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of brake pads

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of brake pads ATE with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

Also available: comparisons of brake pads GALFER with: EBC, POWER STOP, Akebono, Hawk Performance, Brembo, Ferodo, OEM Volkswagen, Bosch, STOPTECH, Carbotech.

You can also see who is better among other brake pads manufacturers: EBC or POWER STOP, EBC or Akebono, EBC or Hawk Performance, Brembo or EBC, Akebono or POWER STOP.

Loading...