Reviews of DEXTER parts For Business

Average Rating ? The manufacturer's average rating is calculated based on ratings of all its spare parts. It determines the place in the manufacturer ranking
3.6
Manufacturer Ranking
#135
24
Spare Parts
1
Country
China
Spare Parts
DEXTER Tires

I would have chosen/ordered these ATX from WM to replace my Falkens, but a tree branch punctured my tires and I was forced to buy *in stock* Dextero DAT1 AT Tires. NOT 3PMS, but look VERY similar the my Wildpeak AT Trails! I got the rear set replaced, will replace the fronts soon. Happy with my purchase.

Pros: happy with purchase
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DEXTER Tires

I have had 2 sets of them in 5 years on an 05 tahoe. First set has lasted me roughly 48k and the most recent pair are still on the tahoe with abiut 20k on them (Tahoe is sitting, I now drive a 2016 Colorado) The tires are made local to me in South Carolina. For the price I cant beat it. I have nothing but good experience with the Dextero AT

Pros: good experience, good price
Mileage: 48000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DEXTER Tires

I have used the DAT1’s on two vehicles and the grip was phenomenal. The DAT1’s made that a joke.

Pros: phenomenal grip
Mileage: 32187 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DEXTER Tires
Sc00terTron
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Very late to the party here. I just put some Dextero All Terrain’s on a 25 year old Chevy S10 that previously belonged to my now 95 year old grandfather. Maybe this isn’t saying much for an older truck that previously had tires that were god knows how old. But I have a much smoother ride now with possibly a little more road noise, but the noise isn’t anything overbearing and is only slightly louder.

Pros: much smoother ride
Cons: little more road noise
Vehicle: Chevrolet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DEXTER Tires

Late to the party but I've ran the DAT10's for years now and have never had an issue with them that wasn't caused by something else. I've been through 4 sets in about 5 years on a 2010 F150. I've never had a blowout or failure and I usually get between 45-55,000 miles.

Pros: no blowouts or failures
Vehicle: Ford
Mileage: 55000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DEXTER Tires

I always get the budget "Dextero" brand from WalMart for my personal vehicles, and they seem to last just fine. Sometimes I have to take them to a real tire shop for re-balance, but most of the time it's fine from the WalMart TLE.

Pros: good longevity
Cons: needs re-balancing
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DEXTER Tires

I can say their cheap "Dextero" tires are a reasonably solid chineseum tire. I think they're badged as 40-45k tires but really they're usually closer to 25-30k.

Pros: reasonably solid
Cons: wear out faster than advertised
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DEXTER Tires

I went from Falken Wildpeak AT Trail to these DAT 1’s. Look very similar. My rears were $91. My fronts not on sale will be $102. The Wildpeaks in 2020 were $126, now $215. So cheap shit for me it is! But they look good and get me to work.

Pros: look good
Cons: cheap
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Owner reviews of DEXTER products

The DEXTER brand is registered in China. Official website is not specified yet.

In March 2026, PartReview recorded 24 reviews across 1 part by DEXTER. Average rating — 3.6 out of 5.

DEXTER is in the PartReview manufacturers ranking, currently at position 135. Over the last 30 days it dropped by 0 points.

Popular DEXTER parts

The most popular DEXTER products on PartReview:

  1. Tires DEXTER - 24 reviews. PR Score — 74, average rating — 3.6.

Most owner reviews about DEXTER parts are collected on these pages.

Top-rated DEXTER parts

DEXTER achieved top positions in these PartReview part rankings:

  1. Best tires — ranked 47 among 66 manufacturers. Received 47191 vote.

Comparisons of DEXTER parts

The most interesting comparisons of DEXTER with other manufacturers help you see which is better:

Loading...