Tires YOKOHAMA or BFGoodrich

YOKOHAMA Tires

Yokohamas would get my vote, theyre decent tires and the price reflects such. But i would also suggest Michelin or Continental offerings.

Pros: decent tires, good price
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

Go with BF Goodrich Comp-2's. I've had a set for over 4 years and over 50K miles. They are nearing the end of their life but still very sticky even in the wet.

Pros: very sticky even wet
Vehicle: Mazda 6
Mileage: 80000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Put Yokohoma Advans and now being driving for 33k miles with no issues. Also has noticeably less road noise than stock Falkens.

Pros: less road noise
Vehicle: Mazda 6
Mileage: 52800 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Yokohama ice guard on my WRX. Does well in slush. Real good in deep snow. Wet roads very good. Dry pavement and temps above 45F, not so great.

Pros: does well in slush
Cons: not great on dry pavement
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

+1 for the BFG Comp2 A/S Plus. I've had a couple sets of the DWS06 tires, but used them as "three season tires," as they are trash in any real snow. But for the other three seasons, they were good.

Pros: good for three seasons
Cons: trash in real snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
The_BullishBear
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

I had ko2s and took them off my truck within a week. All 4 were out of round with high road force in the 80's and 1 was 124. Then I went and got nittos and I have never been happier I will buy for my next set.

Pros: happier with nittos
Cons: out of round, high force
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 ... 88

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...