Tires YOKOHAMA or BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich Tires

Stock Pirellis were getting a little low after about 35,000 miles and decided to upgrade a bit. Went with KO2s 245/65/17. Love the fitment even more. They’re slightly wider than the stock 225s. Make a huge difference off-road and feels more like a truck when driving.

Pros: huge difference off-road
Cons: wore out pretty quick
Mileage: 35000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

Your KO2s/KO3s are excellent tires, you don't need any other tires for a 3 mile drive. They are 3PMS tires and perform well on ice among AT tires.

Pros: excellent tires, perform well
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Since you’re dedicating this set purely for HPDE and want something that survives endurance-style sessions without overheating or chunking, the Yokohama Advan Neova AD09 is the best pick among everything you listed. It holds grip longer than PS4S, it’s far more heat-resistant than the Continental Sport 02, and unlike the RT660, it doesn’t fall off a cliff halfway through a session. Perfect match for a VA STI on stock power and mild camber.

Pros: holds grip longer
Cons: price is high
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Never had a Yokohama tire last more than 30k miles on three different vehicles, so I won’t be buying them again.

Cons: poor mileage
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

I absolutely hate using the KO2's. They're a long lasting tire with a high load rating, but that's because the rubber compound is hard as steel. They're outright dangerous in wet and icy conditions.

Pros: long lasting tire
Cons: dangerous in wet/icy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 88

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...