Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ PHANTOM ➔ IRONMAN

Tires PHANTOM or IRONMAN

Reviews
All
PHANTOM
IRONMAN
IRONMAN › Tires
Advanced_Policy731
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

I'm in ironman gen 2 from tire discounters all 4, i got all the tires and the mount and a alignment and balancing for like 400$ bucks with the deal they run. And a free oil change. But the ironmans have done me well they did good in rain and snow and i haven't exactly been nice to them, handled potholes too.

Pros: good in rain and snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
Ok_Tackle_1320
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

An ultra-high-performance all-season tire, the iMove Gen 3 A/S from Ironman is designed for use on sport and performance-oriented coupes and sedans. Built with large shoulders that improve cornering and handling, the iMove Gen 3 A/S features an all-season rubber compound that allows for solid traction in dry, wet, and light winter weather conditions.

Pros: solid traction, quiet ride
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
backinblackandblue
  • Grip:
Rating 4.5

I thought they must be crap but after looking into them, they are very well-reviewed. A traction A temp, UHP (ultra-high performance) rated. I like them. You could pay $400/tire for a premium brand but they won't be 4 times better or last 4 times longer.

Pros: very well-reviewed, traction A temp, UHP rated, good value
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
Tin_Can_739
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Ironman and milemaker are the last two sets and they lasted about 75% of what a premium brand would.

Cons: shorter lifespan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
Trouble_River
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.5

Money forced my hand a couple summers back and I had to put new front tires on my Grand Marquis at the time. Had to go cheap and bought Ironman iMove all seasons. After a few months the only positives on the ledger were that a) they had tread and b) oddly, they balanced out unbelievably well. 80 MPH on the highway, smooth as glass. Ride and handling quality deteriorated quickly from new and they got loud in a hurry.

Pros: balanced well, smooth at speed
Cons: deteriorated quickly, got loud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
PHANTOM › Tires
cormack_gv
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

They're Chinese junk. They sorta work, but have 20% less traction and 50% less lifetime.

Pros: sorta work
Cons: less traction, less lifetime
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
Robjla
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

This tire is new Iron Man. This is the second chunk missing; the other tire was replaced under warranty. It’s new, maybe 2 months old.

Cons: chunks missing, warranty replacement
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — PHANTOM or IRONMAN?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires PHANTOM and IRONMAN
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — IRONMAN or PHANTOM?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires IRONMAN were overall better than PHANTOM.

  1. PHANTOM received a PR Score of 46 out of 100, and IRONMAN scored 66 points.
  2. PHANTOM ranked 58 in the overall ranking, and IRONMAN ranked 39.
  3. The average rating is higher for IRONMAN (3.2) than for PHANTOM (2.9).
  4. Tires IRONMAN have better feature ratings than PHANTOM:
    • Grip - owners believe, that this property for PHANTOM is better than IRONMAN.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for PHANTOM is outperforms IRONMAN.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for PHANTOM is preferred to IRONMAN.

Which tires are more popular — PHANTOM or IRONMAN?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires IRONMAN were overall more popular than PHANTOM.

By vote balance, tires IRONMAN surpassed PHANTOM:

  • For PHANTOM, the ratio of positive (20) to negative (23) votes is -3 votes.
  • For IRONMAN, the ratio of positive (54) to negative (27) votes is 27 votes.

By number of reviews, tires IRONMAN surpassed PHANTOM:

  • For tires PHANTOM there are 12 reviews: 2 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative.
  • For tires IRONMAN there are 25 reviews: 14 positive, 6 neutral, 5 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — PHANTOM or IRONMAN?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires PHANTOM and IRONMAN have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires PHANTOM with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

Also available: comparisons of tires IRONMAN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›