Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ YOKOHAMA ➔ IRONMAN

Tires YOKOHAMA or IRONMAN

Reviews
All
YOKOHAMA
IRONMAN
YOKOHAMA › Tires
flowopmit
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

Since you’re dedicating this set purely for HPDE and want something that survives endurance-style sessions without overheating or chunking, the Yokohama Advan Neova AD09 is the best pick among everything you listed. It holds grip longer than PS4S, it’s far more heat-resistant than the Continental Sport 02, and unlike the RT660, it doesn’t fall off a cliff halfway through a session. Perfect match for a VA STI on stock power and mild camber.

Pros: holds grip longer
Cons: price is high
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA › Tires
Ahshan_7789
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I still miss my 360,000 mile Gen 3 Prius. I took really good care of it. Imported Japanese brand new hybrid battery , new catalytic converter, brand new Yokohama tires all around with brake pads and discs just to get rammed by a drunk driver.

Pros: good care, new parts
Cons: totaled by drunk driver
Mileage: 579365 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA › Tires
SaltSkull87
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

Yokohama, because the CEAT tires that came with my Hunter slip on the grooves of the streets, but I tried a Triumph 400 with Yokohamas and the grip is exceptional.

Pros: exceptional grip
Cons: CEAT tires slip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
Advanced_Policy731
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

I'm in ironman gen 2 from tire discounters all 4, i got all the tires and the mount and a alignment and balancing for like 400$ bucks with the deal they run. And a free oil change. But the ironmans have done me well they did good in rain and snow and i haven't exactly been nice to them, handled potholes too.

Pros: good in rain and snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
Tin_Can_739
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Ironman and milemaker are the last two sets and they lasted about 75% of what a premium brand would.

Cons: shorter lifespan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA › Tires
CL1VE-B1XBY
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

Never had a Yokohama tire last more than 30k miles on three different vehicles, so I won’t be buying them again.

Cons: poor mileage
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA › Tires
SubieGal9
  • Grip:
Rating 2.0

I had the Yokohama with orange oil on my previous Crosstrek, and it slid in every turn no matter how slow I went.

Cons: slid in every turn
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 57

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — YOKOHAMA or IRONMAN?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires YOKOHAMA and IRONMAN
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — IRONMAN or YOKOHAMA?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA were overall better than IRONMAN.

  1. YOKOHAMA received a PR Score of 82 out of 100, and IRONMAN scored 66 points.
  2. YOKOHAMA ranked 6 in the overall ranking, and IRONMAN ranked 39.
  3. The average rating is higher for YOKOHAMA (4) than for IRONMAN (3.2).
  4. Tires YOKOHAMA have better feature ratings than IRONMAN:
    • Grip - owners believe, that this property for YOKOHAMA is better than IRONMAN.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for YOKOHAMA is outperforms IRONMAN.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for YOKOHAMA is preferred to IRONMAN.

Which tires are more popular — YOKOHAMA or IRONMAN?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA were overall more popular than IRONMAN.

By vote balance, tires YOKOHAMA surpassed IRONMAN:

  • For YOKOHAMA, the ratio of positive (1371) to negative (288) votes is 1083 votes.
  • For IRONMAN, the ratio of positive (54) to negative (27) votes is 27 votes.

By number of reviews, tires YOKOHAMA surpassed IRONMAN:

  • For tires YOKOHAMA there are 539 reviews: 429 positive, 42 neutral, 68 negative.
  • For tires IRONMAN there are 25 reviews: 14 positive, 6 neutral, 5 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — YOKOHAMA or IRONMAN?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA led more car-specific ratings than IRONMAN:

YOKOHAMA are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M2, Dodge Dakota, Porsche Cayenne, Skoda Octavia, Suzuki Swift, Jeep Compass, Nissan Pathfinder, Toyota Celica, Toyota Fortuner, Toyota MR2, Volkswagen Beetle, and others.

Tires IRONMAN have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires YOKOHAMA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, Toyo, Kumho.

Also available: comparisons of tires IRONMAN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, Toyo, Kumho.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›