Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ Falken ➔ IRONMAN

Tires Falken or IRONMAN

Reviews
All
Falken
IRONMAN
Falken › Tires
Vincent10z
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

Have about 2-3 foot of snow in Eastern NC today (still falling) and snow mode did fantastic on my WK2 with Wildpeak AT3W’s

Pros: snow mode did fantastic
Vehicle: Jeep
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken › Tires
w00tah
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I put Falken Aklimates on the 20's on my baby mom's. They are beyond awesome. I had to go to work this past Sunday during the worst of the snow (we got 14" by that evening when I left) and it made it through without a hiccup.

Can't recommend them enough.

Pros: beyond awesome
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken › Tires
TallCracker69
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 5.0

Falken AT4W’s are absolute tanks, loving them so far. They also look much more aggressive than they feel or sound which is a win win for aesthetics / highway

Pros: aggressive look, loving them
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken › Tires
Square_Photo_7041
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I\u2019ve never ever been let down by a set of falken wildpeak at3ws. All season tire so you don\u2019t have to have a dedicated set. Very smooth on the highway for an at tire, available in 10 ply for towing or extreme use, little extra meat on them for when you do go off-road and do fantastic in the snow.

Pros: smooth, fantastic in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken › Tires
realpsilo
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

the Defender 110 the two highway quiet A/Ts people seem to love are the Michelin Defender LTX M/S and Falken Wildpeak A/T3W. the Falkens look a bit more aggressive but are still way less noisy than KO2s.

Pros: look more aggressive
Cons: less noisy than KO2s
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
Tin_Can_739
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Ironman and milemaker are the last two sets and they lasted about 75% of what a premium brand would.

Cons: shorter lifespan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken › Tires
Justin002865
  • Grip:
Rating 2.0

I’m a little disappointed in the Mav (FWD hybrid) snow performance. Even got real nice Falken Wildpeak AT3 all-terrains in August since the factory continentals were dogshit. It gets by alright enough but still slips on acceleration. A lot.

Cons: slips on acceleration
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 95

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — Falken or IRONMAN?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires Falken and IRONMAN
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — IRONMAN or Falken?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Falken were overall better than IRONMAN.

  1. Falken received a PR Score of 81 out of 100, and IRONMAN scored 66 points.
  2. Falken ranked 3 in the overall ranking, and IRONMAN ranked 39.
  3. The average rating is higher for Falken (4) than for IRONMAN (3.2).
  4. Tires Falken have better feature ratings than IRONMAN:
    • Grip - owners believe, that this property for Falken is better than IRONMAN.
    • Noise - drivers claim, that this property for Falken is outperforms IRONMAN.
    • Ride comfort - reviews suggest, that this property for Falken is preferred to IRONMAN.

Which tires are more popular — Falken or IRONMAN?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Falken were overall more popular than IRONMAN.

By vote balance, tires Falken surpassed IRONMAN:

  • For Falken, the ratio of positive (2317) to negative (535) votes is 1782 votes.
  • For IRONMAN, the ratio of positive (54) to negative (27) votes is 27 votes.

By number of reviews, tires Falken surpassed IRONMAN:

  • For tires Falken there are 925 reviews: 719 positive, 80 neutral, 125 negative.
  • For tires IRONMAN there are 25 reviews: 14 positive, 6 neutral, 5 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — Falken or IRONMAN?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires Falken led more car-specific ratings than IRONMAN:

Falken are chosen by owners of cars such as: Jeep Cherokee, Land Rover Defender, Ford Fiesta, Honda Fit, Jeep Wrangler, Toyota 4runner, Volkswagen Corrado, and others.

Tires IRONMAN have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires Falken with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo, Kumho.

Also available: comparisons of tires IRONMAN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo, Kumho.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›