Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ YOKOHAMA ➔ PHANTOM

Tires YOKOHAMA or PHANTOM

Reviews
All
YOKOHAMA
PHANTOM
YOKOHAMA › Tires
flowopmit
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

Since you’re dedicating this set purely for HPDE and want something that survives endurance-style sessions without overheating or chunking, the Yokohama Advan Neova AD09 is the best pick among everything you listed. It holds grip longer than PS4S, it’s far more heat-resistant than the Continental Sport 02, and unlike the RT660, it doesn’t fall off a cliff halfway through a session. Perfect match for a VA STI on stock power and mild camber.

Pros: holds grip longer
Cons: price is high
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA › Tires
Ahshan_7789
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I still miss my 360,000 mile Gen 3 Prius. I took really good care of it. Imported Japanese brand new hybrid battery , new catalytic converter, brand new Yokohama tires all around with brake pads and discs just to get rammed by a drunk driver.

Pros: good care, new parts
Cons: totaled by drunk driver
Mileage: 579365 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA › Tires
SaltSkull87
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

Yokohama, because the CEAT tires that came with my Hunter slip on the grooves of the streets, but I tried a Triumph 400 with Yokohamas and the grip is exceptional.

Pros: exceptional grip
Cons: CEAT tires slip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA › Tires
flipu2k
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

Eu am AT-uri all season (yokohama geolandar g015), foarte multumit. Am fost si la schi iarna asta, drumuri necuratate, n-am avut probleme. La franare pe zapada parca lasa putin de dorit, dar nici michelin-urile vechi de iarna nu erau grozave.

Pros: foarte multumit, n-am avut probleme
Cons: franare lasa de dorit
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA › Tires
CL1VE-B1XBY
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

Never had a Yokohama tire last more than 30k miles on three different vehicles, so I won’t be buying them again.

Cons: poor mileage
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA › Tires
SubieGal9
  • Grip:
Rating 2.0

I had the Yokohama with orange oil on my previous Crosstrek, and it slid in every turn no matter how slow I went.

Cons: slid in every turn
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 56

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — YOKOHAMA or PHANTOM?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires YOKOHAMA and PHANTOM
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — PHANTOM or YOKOHAMA?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA were overall better than PHANTOM.

  1. YOKOHAMA received a PR Score of 82 out of 100, and PHANTOM scored 46 points.
  2. YOKOHAMA ranked 6 in the overall ranking, and PHANTOM ranked 58.
  3. The average rating is higher for YOKOHAMA (4) than for PHANTOM (2.9).
  4. Tires YOKOHAMA have better feature ratings than PHANTOM:
    • Grip - owners believe, that this property for YOKOHAMA is better than PHANTOM.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for YOKOHAMA is outperforms PHANTOM.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for YOKOHAMA is preferred to PHANTOM.

Which tires are more popular — YOKOHAMA or PHANTOM?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA were overall more popular than PHANTOM.

By vote balance, tires YOKOHAMA surpassed PHANTOM:

  • For YOKOHAMA, the ratio of positive (1371) to negative (288) votes is 1083 votes.
  • For PHANTOM, the ratio of positive (20) to negative (23) votes is -3 votes.

By number of reviews, tires YOKOHAMA surpassed PHANTOM:

  • For tires YOKOHAMA there are 539 reviews: 429 positive, 42 neutral, 68 negative.
  • For tires PHANTOM there are 12 reviews: 2 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — YOKOHAMA or PHANTOM?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA led more car-specific ratings than PHANTOM:

YOKOHAMA are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M2, Dodge Dakota, Porsche Cayenne, Skoda Octavia, Suzuki Swift, Jeep Compass, Nissan Pathfinder, Toyota Celica, Toyota Fortuner, Toyota MR2, Volkswagen Beetle, and others.

Tires PHANTOM have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires YOKOHAMA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, Toyo, Kumho.

Also available: comparisons of tires PHANTOM with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, Toyo, Kumho.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›