Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

MICHELIN Tires

I used Michelin 2ct in the front and Michelin road 6 in the back for one season because the front lasts way longer than the rear. Had no problems.

Pros: no problems, front lasts longer
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
dz_beerz
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I'm about 7 months into CC2s on my 2021 Forester and I'm now a fan. It took some getting used to but the driving has been really comfortable. Really good grip in wet weather and I'm not really seeing much if any dip in MPG. On longer trips I'm still clocking 34-35 MPG. For the noise people mentioned, I don't notice much of a difference from the stock tires - Bridgestone Ecopias.

Pros: good grip in wet, comfortable driving
Cons: none
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Wadetheblade
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I have them on my Forester, like them a lot. I don't notice the noise too much, but the Forester is rather loud anyways. They seem to be wearing at a normal rate.

Pros: normal wear rate
Cons: none
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Spicywolff
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

I have those on my c63S. They are ok, but I feel the same about the Michelin offering as well. All seasons suck. Not as much wet or dry grip, louder then summers. But they are cheaper and last longer.

Pros: cheaper, last longer
Cons: less grip, louder
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I hated my geolanders and was so glad to get rid of them. True that my only off roading is forest roads but I have a set of Michelin defenders that takes on everything from dry slalom’s to loose forest road hills and snow with quiet confidence.

Pros: confidence on various terrains
Cons: hated geolanders
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...