Tires IRONMAN or GT Radial

GT Radial Tires

Haven't tried any GT Radials on my SUVs or pickup, but I am using/have used them on my hatchback (Champiro GTX Pro 300tw, ₱4k per tire) and sedan (Champiro SX2 200tw, ₱6.5k per tire). In terms of pricing, with the sizes and variants I got, they're only a hair cheaper than the established brands. Although, performance is also comparable to what my other options are so I'm still satisfied. They're also good against punctures since I never got punctured even after 4/5 years.

Pros: good against punctures
Cons: hair cheaper
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GT Radial Tires

Very good. Been using the all terrain version ng Savero for farm use, rough road, for more than 3yrs ok pa naman. A lot cheaper, and less road noise pa compared sa Yokohama

Pros: less road noise, a lot cheaper
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GT Radial Tires
merrymayhemmaker
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Since my budget is kinda tight now, I did some research here in the sub and ended up buying the HT variant of the GT Radial Savero SUV line. So far I’m loving it since the ride is quiet/comfy, braking is good, and the overall handling is smooth.

Pros: quiet/comfy ride, good braking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires

I'm in ironman gen 2 from tire discounters all 4, i got all the tires and the mount and a alignment and balancing for like 400$ bucks with the deal they run. And a free oil change. But the ironmans have done me well they did good in rain and snow and i haven't exactly been nice to them, handled potholes too.

Pros: good in rain and snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GT Radial Tires

other than being louder than the stock bridgestone turanza that replaced my forester's tires, can't compain about the performance on the road. going 30k now and still has alot of meat.

Pros: alot of meat
Cons: louder than stock
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires
Tin_Can_739
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Ironman and milemaker are the last two sets and they lasted about 75% of what a premium brand would.

Cons: shorter lifespan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires

This tire is new Iron Man. This is the second chunk missing; the other tire was replaced under warranty. It’s new, maybe 2 months old.

Cons: chunks missing, warranty replacement
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GT Radial Tires
MissGenX
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Post is old but for others who read- these are the absolute worst tires I have ever purchased. Do not recommend. Replacing after 2 years and a load of probs later. You get what you pay for!

Cons: absolute worst tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which tires to choose — IRONMAN or GT Radial?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires IRONMAN and GT Radial
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — GT Radial or IRONMAN?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires GT Radial were overall better than IRONMAN.

  1. IRONMAN received a PR Score of 66 out of 100, and GT Radial scored 78 points.
  2. IRONMAN ranked 39 in the overall ranking, and GT Radial ranked 27.
  3. The average rating is higher for GT Radial (3.8) than for IRONMAN (3.2).
  4. Tires GT Radial have better feature ratings than IRONMAN:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for GT Radial is better than IRONMAN.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for GT Radial is outperforms IRONMAN.
    • Grip - reviews suggest, that this property for GT Radial is preferred to IRONMAN.

Which tires are more popular — IRONMAN or GT Radial?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires GT Radial were overall more popular than IRONMAN.

By vote balance, tires GT Radial surpassed IRONMAN:

  • For IRONMAN, the ratio of positive (54) to negative (27) votes is 27 votes.
  • For GT Radial, the ratio of positive (150) to negative (42) votes is 108 votes.

By number of reviews, tires GT Radial surpassed IRONMAN:

  • For tires IRONMAN there are 25 reviews: 14 positive, 6 neutral, 5 negative.
  • For tires GT Radial there are 60 reviews: 42 positive, 12 neutral, 6 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — IRONMAN or GT Radial?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires GT Radial led more car-specific ratings than IRONMAN:

GT Radial are chosen by owners of cars such as: Toyota Innova, and others.

Tires IRONMAN have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires IRONMAN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

Also available: comparisons of tires GT Radial with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...