Tires YOKOHAMA or GT Radial

GT Radial Tires

Haven't tried any GT Radials on my SUVs or pickup, but I am using/have used them on my hatchback (Champiro GTX Pro 300tw, ₱4k per tire) and sedan (Champiro SX2 200tw, ₱6.5k per tire). In terms of pricing, with the sizes and variants I got, they're only a hair cheaper than the established brands. Although, performance is also comparable to what my other options are so I'm still satisfied. They're also good against punctures since I never got punctured even after 4/5 years.

Pros: good against punctures
Cons: hair cheaper
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GT Radial Tires

Very good. Been using the all terrain version ng Savero for farm use, rough road, for more than 3yrs ok pa naman. A lot cheaper, and less road noise pa compared sa Yokohama

Pros: less road noise, a lot cheaper
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GT Radial Tires
merrymayhemmaker
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Since my budget is kinda tight now, I did some research here in the sub and ended up buying the HT variant of the GT Radial Savero SUV line. So far I’m loving it since the ride is quiet/comfy, braking is good, and the overall handling is smooth.

Pros: quiet/comfy ride, good braking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Since you’re dedicating this set purely for HPDE and want something that survives endurance-style sessions without overheating or chunking, the Yokohama Advan Neova AD09 is the best pick among everything you listed. It holds grip longer than PS4S, it’s far more heat-resistant than the Continental Sport 02, and unlike the RT660, it doesn’t fall off a cliff halfway through a session. Perfect match for a VA STI on stock power and mild camber.

Pros: holds grip longer
Cons: price is high
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
GT Radial Tires

other than being louder than the stock bridgestone turanza that replaced my forester's tires, can't compain about the performance on the road. going 30k now and still has alot of meat.

Pros: alot of meat
Cons: louder than stock
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

Never had a Yokohama tire last more than 30k miles on three different vehicles, so I won’t be buying them again.

Cons: poor mileage
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
YOKOHAMA Tires

I had the Yokohama with orange oil on my previous Crosstrek, and it slid in every turn no matter how slow I went.

Cons: slid in every turn
Vehicle: Subaru
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 60

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which tires to choose — YOKOHAMA or GT Radial?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires YOKOHAMA and GT Radial
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — GT Radial or YOKOHAMA?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA were overall better than GT Radial.

  1. YOKOHAMA received a PR Score of 82 out of 100, and GT Radial scored 78 points.
  2. YOKOHAMA ranked 6 in the overall ranking, and GT Radial ranked 27.
  3. The average rating is higher for YOKOHAMA (4) than for GT Radial (3.8).
  4. Tires YOKOHAMA have better feature ratings than GT Radial:
    • Grip - owners believe, that this property for YOKOHAMA is better than GT Radial.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for YOKOHAMA is outperforms GT Radial.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for YOKOHAMA is preferred to GT Radial.

Which tires are more popular — YOKOHAMA or GT Radial?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA were overall more popular than GT Radial.

By vote balance, tires YOKOHAMA surpassed GT Radial:

  • For YOKOHAMA, the ratio of positive (1371) to negative (288) votes is 1083 votes.
  • For GT Radial, the ratio of positive (150) to negative (42) votes is 108 votes.

By number of reviews, tires YOKOHAMA surpassed GT Radial:

  • For tires YOKOHAMA there are 539 reviews: 429 positive, 42 neutral, 68 negative.
  • For tires GT Radial there are 60 reviews: 42 positive, 12 neutral, 6 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — YOKOHAMA or GT Radial?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires YOKOHAMA led more car-specific ratings than GT Radial:

YOKOHAMA are chosen by owners of cars such as: BMW M2, Dodge Dakota, Porsche Cayenne, Skoda Octavia, Suzuki Swift, Jeep Compass, Nissan Pathfinder, Toyota Celica, Toyota Fortuner, Toyota MR2, Volkswagen Beetle, and others.

GT Radial are chosen by owners of cars such as: Toyota Innova, and others.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires YOKOHAMA with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, Toyo, Kumho.

Also available: comparisons of tires GT Radial with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, Toyo, Kumho.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...