Tires Falken or BRIDGESTONE

PartReview Score

Rank #3 in ranking

1782

719

125

925

4.0

Grip

4.0

Noise

3.8

Ride comfort

3.6

Owners' choice:

PR Score

Ranking

Votes

Reviews

Average rating

Properties

Car

PartReview Score

Rank #5 in ranking

1551

667

150

915

3.9

Grip

4.0

Noise

3.5

Ride comfort

3.4

Owners' choice:

Reviews

All

Falken

BRIDGESTONE

BRIDGESTONE › Tires

Grimoire 14 Oct 2012, 02:33

Grip:

Rating 4.0

I live in Langley. I run Bridgestone Blizzak LM-25 which work great for the amount of snow we get, while still being a decent performance tire.

Pros: decent performance tire

Vehicle: Subaru

Falken › Tires

whyteboi 27 Sep 2012, 01:03

Rating 5.0

I use Falken myself.

BRIDGESTONE › Tires

TN Tig 1 24 Aug 2012, 13:27

Noise:

Rating 5.0

My Pirellis got very noisy at 20K and were badly cupped by 30K. I wouldn't recommend replacing them with another set of the same tire. I put Bridgestone RE 970AS Pole Positions on my GTI and have been very happy with them so far. They had the highest ratings on Tire Rack, just edging out the Conti Extreme Contacts.

Pros: very happy

Cons: noisy, badly cupped

Vehicle: Volkswagen

Mileage: 20000 km

Part number: RE 970AS

BRIDGESTONE › Tires

zanderini 1 Aug 2012, 19:25

Grip:
Ride comfort:

Rating 5.0

Highly recommend Bridgestone ecopia tires had 2 sets on the Prius lasted 60k each,handled well,and gave good efficiency

Pros: good efficiency, handled well

Vehicle: Toyota Prius

Mileage: 60000 km

BRIDGESTONE › Tires

Clun9 28 Jun 2012, 04:08

Grip:

Rating 5.0

Bridgestone Potenza S01 Pole Positions or RE050A are far superior...

Pros: far superior

Falken › Tires

dopesauce 24 Apr 2012, 02:49

Rating 5.0

Front: 17x9.5 et21 215/45/17 Falken 512 Rear: 17x9.5 et19 215/45/17 Falken 512

Falken › Tires

mk3_vdub 21 Apr 2012, 03:56

Rating 5.0

Wheel: Long Beaches Front: 17 x 7 et 18 215/45 falken 912 Rear: 17 x 7 et18 215/45 falken 912

Falken › Tires

livinzlyfe 21 Apr 2012, 03:38

Rating 5.0

18x8.5 et 15 with 215/40 falken 512 18x10 et 30 with 235/40 falken 512

Falken › Tires

Afazz 5 Sep 2008, 13:42

Grip:

Rating 3.0

Have you considered a 205-40-17 Falken 512? It's a crappy tire, but it stretches well.

Pros: stretches well

Cons: crappy tire

Falken › Tires

'88Jetta16v 6 Nov 2007, 22:56

Grip:
Noise:

Rating 1.0

Compared to the Dunlop SP-5000 Sports on my GLI, which have a couple years on them at this point and only cost $74 apiece, the Falkens are awful; they don't grip, they're ugly, and they're noisy.

Cons: don't grip, ugly, noisy

Vehicle: Volkswagen