Tires BRIDGESTONE or BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich Tires
dconstruck
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Bfg at's. Great in nothing, decent in everything. My favourite all around tire, that doesn't have any drawbacks.

Pros: decent in everything
Cons: great in nothing
Vehicle: Toyota FJ Cruiser
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
danny_16v
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

Conti DW is a good tire. A bit soft of a sidewall so some vague response. Bridgestone Potenza s04 pole position is better. Better response. Good in wet and good life. Closest to a Michelin Pilot super sport you'll get. Tire Rack rated it a close 2nd if I remember right. I have had both on my M3. I'd get the Bridgestone again, have them now.

Pros: better response, good in wet, good life
Vehicle: BMW
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
alex_plex
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Bought new tires - Bridgestone Potenza RE002 205/50R16. Yeah, it is not stance size, but I'm very bored of driving my static low Corrado with low profile tyres, and would like to enjoy the driving R36 engine without slow down before every pit

Pros: new tires
Cons: not stance size
Part number: RE002
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

I went with the G-Force Comp-2 A/S and paid something like $703 after installation, which also included a road hazard warranty. I found a really good deal and could have gotten some alternatives even cheaper, but the tire was the highest ranked in its category on TireRack. No regrets with the purchase, as these tires significantly outperform the Continental OEMs.

Pros: significantly outperform Continental OEMs
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I use Blizzak DMV2 (suv version of the WS80) on my Santa Fe. Unstoppable in deep snow, but that has mattered maybe twice so far this winter. On ice they have been better than my all seasons, but they have not been incredible.

Pros: unstoppable in deep snow
Cons: not incredible on ice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
BUJonathan
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

I had Ecopias (EDIT: EL-400s) on my Mazda3. They would not die. At like 90k miles I replaced them because they had gotten hard and the snow traction declined... they still had a decent amount of tread left.

Pros: decent amount of tread
Cons: gotten hard, snow traction declined
Vehicle: Mazda 3
Mileage: 144841 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
oldracer
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

I went wit Nitto 555s on the GLIwhich has a much bigger tracttion problem than the R's....huge ride, trn-in and traction improvement. OEM there was the rimprotectors known as Bridgestone RE050As in 225/40/18....horrible crap.

Pros: traction improvement, huge ride
Cons: horrible crap
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...