Tires BFGoodrich or Nokia

BFGoodrich Tires
nomad2284
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

The traction is one aspect but proven durability off road is hard to put a value on. K02s have eaten some ugly road.

Pros: proven off-road durability, good traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
Genghis-Ron-
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

2k miles in and I love them. 1-1.5mpg decrease from the stock OEM tires.

Pros: love them
Cons: 1-1.5mpg decrease
Vehicle: Toyota
Mileage: 3219 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Nokian hakkapeliittas are great - my #1 pick. Blizzaks good to great and much cheaper. No complaints with the Blizzaks, but I just had the impression with the Hakkas that they were another level - really surprisingly good in the worst conditions.

Pros: surprisingly good in conditions
Cons: Blizzaks much cheaper
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I’m a fan of Nokian brand. Finland knows snow and it shows in their tires. I’ve been using them for years and love having dedicated snow tires. After I had been using them for about 5 years, I talked my wife into getting a set for her car. She was mad I hadn’t talked her into it sooner.

Pros: dedicated snow tires, night and day difference
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
nicholism007
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

I run wrg4’s for winters and their decent. They’re not loud and they’re fine in the dry and wet. Snow and ice they could better. Not as good as a full winter but better than all seasons.

Pros: fine in dry and wet
Cons: could be better snow/ice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Ei oo just noista kokemusta, mutta muutama vuosi sitten ostin Nokian Nordman 7 nastarenkaat. Ne oli alusta asti surkeat kaikissa talviolosuhteissa.

Cons: surkeat kaikissa talviolosuhteissa
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ... 104

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...