Tires BFGoodrich or Nokia

BFGoodrich Tires

I currently have 285/70r17 k02s and genuinely love them, and have put them through some pretty rough stuff.

Pros: genuinely loved, handled rough stuff
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I got Nokian Tyres, all season last fall. I drove them all last winter, which was quite snowy, 62 km each day during the work week. No issues. One very snowy day the ramp of my building wasn’t plowed or defrosted. Other cars couldn’t get up the ramp. I watched 3-4 cars try and fail and I got there and up I went no issues.

Pros: no issues, good in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

BFGoodrich all terrain tires have been my go to as we have them on our jeep right now (which we are not keeping much longer).

Pros: reliable choice
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Studded tires are superior in ice. I have ran Nokian studded and studless and studded are my choice by a large margin. I run them for max performance in the worst of conditions even if that means giving up a little performance in better conditions.

Pros: superior in ice, max performance
Cons: less performance in better conditions
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

The 275/70/17 size shouldn’t rub with stock suspension, my bfg ko2’s never did and now I have ko3’s and they don’t.

Pros: no rubbing with stock suspension
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
spleee
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

I had Nokian WRG2s on a car once in the summer. Technically an all-season, but a very very soft all-season. The only thing to note was that under hard braking/cornering they would get squirrelly since the rubber was so soft.

Pros: good traction in rain
Cons: squirrelly under hard braking
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Their new US plant seems to have quality control issues. I never had similar issues with my old imported ones, but bought a set a few years ago that came from the new Tennessee plant and they had major dry rot within two years.

Cons: major dry rot
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 ... 104

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...