Tires BFGoodrich or Maxxis

BFGoodrich Tires
roXterra
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Good advice below, I have LTs with K02 but I would get C rated instead if I could get them in same setup I have, tire, rim, raised letters.

Less mass means more mpg on highway. Offroad the softer tires can feel softer too.

Pros: more mpg on highway
Cons: punctured on a stick
Vehicle: Nissan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
No_Original5693
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I’m running 265/70/17 (123 load) K03 on my 4Runner and I’ve been pleased with washboard performance (2mi of sort on my commute). They do like to chuck rocks more than the AT3W (not sure how the AT4W is). Rain performance has been great here in Maine. Haven’t had enough snow yet

Pros: pleased with performance, great rain
Cons: chuck rocks
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
JackHazzes
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I switched the Kumho Crugens that came with my 2022 Santa Cruz SEL nonturbo with activity to BF Goodrich Trail Terrain, still at 245/60r18 about 2 weeks ago. The Trail Terrain is a lot more quiet, in fact, I can hear the hum of the engine much clearer now. Great in mild snow and ice, never slipped. It also performed very well in the rain and a little puddle, no hydroplaning so far. Cornering is not at good as the Crugen and needed a bit of correction. The ride is almost as comfy as the Crugen, but I can feel the little road imperfections subtly. I averaged 26.8 mpg on the Crugen, the Trail Terrain set me back a dismal 23.9 mpg.

Pros: more quiet, great in snow
Cons: cornering not as good
Vehicle: Hyundai
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

I have bf Goodrich GeForce comp 2 and they are fantastic in the rain. Not sure if they sell a size to fit the stock wheel but 205 45 16 only rubs on hard corners downhill and it’s lowered in coilovers

Pros: fantastic in the rain
Cons: rubs on hard corners
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
CreativeUsername20
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Yeah, keep rotating them and keep the alignment good. My BFG KO2s are holding up very well, having 40k miles on them.

Pros: holding up very well
Mileage: 64000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

Only have experience with the KO2s. They’re overpriced and get quite loud as they wear and sometimes have balancing issues, especially as they wear down. But I’ll be damned they last forever.

Pros: last forever
Cons: overpriced, balancing issues
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Maxxis Tires

Specialized control tyres and it’s not even close.

No it’s not worth the “premium” as they’re not more premium. The spesh tyres are specced on their £14000 bikes, they are also racing and winning world cups, cape epics, short track races, marathons for years with the rest of them. Spesh has led the way with a couple others with FEA and camps set up for surely testing their tyres with a refresh every few years. There is no “premium”. The stickers are fancier on the maxxis. But they’re heavier. Higher rolling resistance. Higher weight. No noticeable gain in traction to account for those either. Spesh offers sworks 120 tpi, softer and harder (T7 and T5 respectively) control tyres. All you’re choosing is 120 vs 60 tpi determining a less or more robust carcass.

A life long sworks 120 tpi snob. I went maxxis aspen and hated life. That’s a gravel tyre. Tore through the Vittoria barzo. Went ikon and they’re a great once was a race tyre now a recreational tyre— but been left for dead with rolling resistance, grip and weight by the competition. Rekon race won’t get a look in from the tyre tests and price and weight. Nah ta.

Pros: racing and winning world cups
Cons: heavier, higher resistance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ... 53

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...