Tires PHANTOM or RIKEN

RIKEN Tires

Tires like the Riken Raptor are a soft tire and performance minded, but not full on track tire (300tw). They perform quite well, but at the same time, are dirt cheap.

Pros: perform quite well
Cons: not full on track
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN Tires

In my experience the best bang for your buck summer tire is the Riken Raptor. They're about $100 a pop and have great dry grip. Downside is that they're not amazing in very wet conditions.

Pros: great dry grip
Cons: not amazing in wet
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN Tires

Riken Raptor ZR A/S RF. These tires were under $400 for a SET (about $86 per tire). 300tw. Aggressive tire pattern. And they are a solid performer for canyon carving. I drove them about 4000 miles over a week this past summer around MATG including some pretty aggressive backroad driving and they held up VERY well. Insanely well given the price.

Pros: solid performer, aggressive pattern
Cons: grip suffers a bit
Mileage: 4000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
PHANTOM Tires

Currently, running Phantom C-sports. Have 25k on these...and they are wearing o0n target to reach the 50k guarantee.

Pros: wearing on target
Cons: EV tires are a scam
Vehicle: Kia
Mileage: 40200 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN Tires

Licna preporuka za neku budget gumu je Riken, odlicna po suhom, drzi nenormalno po suhom, nesto slabija po mokrom.

Pros: odlicna po suhom
Cons: slabija po mokrom
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN Tires

Eu am Riken Snow pe mașina de la lucru, pe uscat zici că e pe șine, nu zice pâs dar pe ud am niște emoții de nu-i adevărat ???? nu doar odată era să fac piruete cu ea la viteze de nimic și stai că astea-s bune că am avut pe masina de la lucru inainte un set blanao de viatti brina, dădeam scârb 1-2-3 pe ud cu 1.4 aspirat, babaiatule...

Pros: pe uscat zici ca e pe sine
Cons: emotii pe ud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
PHANTOM Tires

Some tires are made in China and some possibly(?) better ones are made Vietnam, while made in Korea tires usually aren't bad, but may not last as long as expensive tires. For safety, I wouldn't go too cheap on tires. Many cheap tires have rather poor traction when new and become unsafe with only a few miles of wear on them. The Chinese tires often are made of very hard rubber, which might wear well, but has poor traction. There may be some in between tires made in the Philippines, but I'd avoid them. Kumho is a Korean tire company with majority Chinese ownership by a Chinese tire company. They make Phantom tires, likely in China, but even in Korea, they would be the low end. Hankook tires are "better" Korean tires. Not the best, but seem safer. I'd check tire reviews on the Internet.

Pros: may wear well (hard rubber)
Cons: poor traction, not safe, avoid cheap
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
PHANTOM Tires
cormack_gv
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

They're Chinese junk. They sorta work, but have 20% less traction and 50% less lifetime.

Pros: sorta work
Cons: less traction, less lifetime
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
RIKEN Tires

Uzeo sam pre 2 godine all season riken i za prvih godinu dana nisam primetio nista lose, medjutim od skoro su pocele da se ponasaju dosta lose, drze krivinu solidno dobro ali na gas i kocnicu proklizavaju bas dosta

Pros: drze krivinu solidno dobro
Cons: proklizavaju bas dosta
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which tires to choose — PHANTOM or RIKEN?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires PHANTOM and RIKEN
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — RIKEN or PHANTOM?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires RIKEN were overall better than PHANTOM.

  1. PHANTOM received a PR Score of 46 out of 100, and RIKEN scored 71 point.
  2. PHANTOM ranked 58 in the overall ranking, and RIKEN ranked 55.
  3. The average rating is higher for RIKEN (3.6) than for PHANTOM (2.9).
  4. Tires RIKEN have better feature ratings than PHANTOM:
    • Grip - owners believe, that this property for RIKEN is better than PHANTOM.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for RIKEN is outperforms PHANTOM.
    • Noise - reviews suggest, that this property for PHANTOM is preferred to RIKEN.

Which tires are more popular — PHANTOM or RIKEN?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires RIKEN were overall more popular than PHANTOM.

By vote balance, tires RIKEN surpassed PHANTOM:

  • For PHANTOM, the ratio of positive (20) to negative (23) votes is -3 votes.
  • For RIKEN, the ratio of positive (35) to negative (14) votes is 21 vote.

By number of reviews, tires RIKEN surpassed PHANTOM:

  • For tires PHANTOM there are 12 reviews: 2 positive, 7 neutral, 3 negative.
  • For tires RIKEN there are 15 reviews: 9 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — PHANTOM or RIKEN?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires PHANTOM and RIKEN have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires PHANTOM with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

Also available: comparisons of tires RIKEN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...