Tires NITTO or BFGoodrich

NITTO Tires

285/65/18 XL Ridge grapps here.

From my research, best weight to load capacity to performance ratios.

Probably will buy again.

Pros: best weight to load
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
NITTO Tires
Godly1n
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

I had NeoGens (205/50r15) and liked the way they looked, and they handled great in dry weather... But would break loose in wet pretty easily. And while I had them I didn't notice the road noise until... I got some Continental ExtremeContact Sports (205/50r15) These guys have much less road noise, except at slower speeds where you can hear every single tiny rock and pebble tossed up in the wheel well lol. But they look fantastic and are incredible in dry AND wet weather!

Pros: handled great in dry weather, looked good
Cons: break loose in wet, road noise
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
Dr_Egon
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

Drove about 30 miles on AT3W but the steering wheel shake was so bad that I paid more for the KO2’s. Shake is still there but not as bad. Whatever you pick, make sure to get your wheels properly road force balanced.

Cons: steering wheel shake
Mileage: 48 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
tw1st3d5
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

I've had some serious issues with the KO2s and balancing them. Even with all tires requiring less than 10# of road force to balance the 4Runner still shakes like crazy between 45 and 60. I've been through 8x 265/70R17, and 12x 285/70R17 on my 2012. I'm never buying them again.

Now offroad, they are amazing. Been through quite a bit of stuff that I didn't think we could make it through and never had any issues.

Pros: amazing offroad
Cons: serious balancing issues
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 68

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...