Tires MICHELIN or Kumho

MICHELIN Tires
MagnumMagnets
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

We replaced the Toyos at 38k miles with 3/32 on them, got Michelin Defender 2s and they’re night and day different

Pros: night and day different
Vehicle: Mazda
Mileage: 38000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Ich bin ganz zufrieden mit den Crossclimate. Die erkaufen sich ihre lange Haltbarkeit und gute Performance bei Trockenheit aber mit Schwächen bei Nässe.

Pros: lange Haltbarkeit, gute Performance
Cons: Schwächen bei Nässe
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
OhmsAmpsVolts
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I went with Kumho, competitive pricing and I’ve had them on a few years now and 30k miles. Still looking good

Pros: competitive pricing, still looking good
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
InvisibleTacoSnack
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Michelin Defenders. Best tires on the market, have them on my 2500HD for the past 3 years and there is very little wear and I go 90mph

Pros: best tires, little wear
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
ijustbrushalot
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

My winters aren't too different, and I've had or have all of them: Pilot Alpin, X-Ice Snow, and CC2 (all North American versions). The CC2 were just too floppy and imprecise for me, and that's on a modified daily driver crossover. On a 986 the steering and handling response would be damaged noticeably over Pilot Alpins imo. If you're a fan of feel (and likely traction overall, honestly), get the UHP winters. They're by far my category of choice because of the sporty feel they maintain on performance cars.

Pros: sporty feel, good traction
Cons: floppy, imprecise
Vehicle: Porsche
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...