Tires MICHELIN or DEBICA

MICHELIN Tires

Ich bin ganz zufrieden mit den Crossclimate. Die erkaufen sich ihre lange Haltbarkeit und gute Performance bei Trockenheit aber mit Schwächen bei Nässe.

Pros: lange Haltbarkeit, gute Performance
Cons: Schwächen bei Nässe
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
DEBICA Tires

Debica Presto HP2, EU made over Kumho.

Better brake result here then Barum. But probably shorter life.

Pros: better brake result
Cons: probably shorter life
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
InvisibleTacoSnack
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Michelin Defenders. Best tires on the market, have them on my 2500HD for the past 3 years and there is very little wear and I go 90mph

Pros: best tires, little wear
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Michelin are great tyres and very grippy but wear quickly because they are usually a softer compound than the equivalent in other brands

Pros: great tyres, very grippy
Cons: wear quickly
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I will say after installing diff and subframe bushings, there is a marked difference in cold weather performance on these tires. The car likes to step out a lot more readily. With stock bushings, the difference shouldn't be that exaggerated, but there is a difference in performance on cold Pilots.

Cons: not good in cold
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...