Tires MICHELIN or Continental

MICHELIN Tires

My Michelin PSAS4s are at 6/32" and so just past mid-life after 50,000 km. I don't have anything bad to say about them; the sidewalls are just right.

Pros: sidewalls are just right
Mileage: 50000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
DTGR_trading
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Treated it with the new Michelin cross climate 3 sport wich improved handling a lot. Was a little worried about comfort but it’s not as bad as I thought.

Pros: improved handling
Cons: initial comfort concerns
Vehicle: Volvo V60
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Personal, pe un Q5 cu stage 1 la 230 de cai (si o conduita preventiva) nu am avut absolut nicio problema cu Michelin CrossClimate2 atat iarna cat si vara.

Pros: nicio problema iarna si vara
Vehicle: Audi Q5
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Additional_Service68
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

Michelin has god level comfort and wet braking. My honda jazz came with Michelin XM2. The problem is due to softer compound. It lasts lesser kms. I have to change mine around 35k kms.

Due to some import restrictions, I was unable to find 195 60 Michelin so asked trye shops. Almost everyone recommended Yoko for city rough road use. I use Yokohoma now and though its not as good as Michelin its defined better than MRF Bridgestone used in my relatives car.

Pros: god level comfort, wet braking
Cons: lasts lesser kms
Vehicle: Honda Jazz
Mileage: 35000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Continental Tires
aayushpanwar
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

My Car ( Honda City 4th Gen 2022) came with Goodyear Assurance 175 65 15 they lasted for 30K km from those, switched to Continental UC6 195 60 R15. Most of my driving are on good roads and highways , did Delhi to Ahmedabad post upgrade, really loved the ride comfort and how overall tyre noise got reduced, also car started gliding over small potholes and bumps effortlessly. I was also considering Yokohama Blue Earth GT but couldn\u2019t find it easily in the size I required.

Pros: ride comfort, reduced noise
Vehicle: Honda City
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Mindless_Evidence881
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

Using the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and the ride has been phenomenal until now. Amazing grip and silent too on high speeds. Just that they're quite expensive compared to other brands. Currently done 30k kms on them. Had a sidewall rupture once which fortunately got covered under warranty.

Pros: amazing grip, silent
Cons: quite expensive
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Continental Tires
AnotherPerspectiv
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

My Polo came with Apollo, worked okay and lasted till 35k. Replaced them with continental uc6 and man it makes alot of difference, be it noise, comfort or grip. Been using for last 15k and looks almost new without a single puncture.

Pros: noise, comfort, grip
Cons: worked okay
Vehicle: Volkswagen Polo
Mileage: 15000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Continental Tires
cshmn
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

Toyo EXTENSA A/S II, Michelin Defender 2, Continental TrueContact Tour, etc. These tires are all more or less the same idea, made to be affordable, quiet, efficient and generally average in every way with very marginal, just barely good enough winter performance to get a m+s rating.

Pros: affordable, quiet, efficient
Cons: marginal winter performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Had the same ones on a Crosstrek. They take the cake as my worst tires. Period. They handled worse in snow than my now Michelin Pilot Sport A/S tires, which is NOT a high bar. And only lasted 40k miles before the tread was done.

Cons: handled worse in snow
Vehicle: Subaru
Mileage: 40000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...