Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

BRIDGESTONE Tires

My car came with the Toyos and they lasted one summer, in the winter I run Blizzaks. Summer 2012 and 2013 I ran Potenza RE-11s. These has spent 3 weekends at Tail of the Dragon in that time and still have tread left on them to get me into next season and they are stickier than the Toyo Proxes and about $100 per tire cheaper.

Pros: stickier than Toyo Proxes, cheaper
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

Primacy owner here. Not sure about other Michelins, but these tires have a sunflower seed oil coating that improves the overall grip. Driving around corners you immediately notice the grip and extra cornering speed. For performance and overall economy, these are the best tires i've ever owned.

Pros: improved grip, extra speed
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

I put a set of Michelin Latitude tires on my wife's Liberty. What a different from using a more dedicated off-road tire.

Pros: different driving experience
Vehicle: Jeep
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
adrew
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

Our '11 Yaris came with the almost universally-hated Bridgestone RE92s. At 18k miles/two years we were ready to replace them since we were getting lots of ABS and traction control action (wheelspin galore) on wet roads as well as occasional stability control intervention during quick-ish maneuvers in normal driving. Since this is my wife's car, I put a priority on traction, excellent braking and grip on wet roads and quietness/smooth ride over outright handling (she's a calm driver) -- so I had a set of Defenders put on her car today while Costco is having $70 off a set this month. They are really excellent and have transformed the car. Before, with the Bridgestones, it was difficult to carry on a conversation, especially with anyone in the back seat. Now, you can do it -- there's more engine and wind noise than road noise (previously it was the opposite). Minor impacts like potholes and reflectors are much less noticeable, too. Handling is just adequate since it's a standard touring tire, but steering response is decent (but not super quick, either) and there's a lot of ultimate grip there (definitely not all roly-poly). Braking seems much better, too. I stomped the brakes going down a bumpy hill leaving my neighborhood (ABS would always go off in this spot with the old tires) and the car just stopped without any drama, which was refreshing. Give them a shot if you're looking for a competent, quiet, smooth tire that lasts a long time (90k warranty!) if you have a vehicle in your household that doesn't require a sporty tire.

Pros: excellent braking, smooth ride
Cons: handling just adequate
Mileage: 28968 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires
Preppy
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

I switch from the 255/40R19 oem Pirellis to 215/65R16 Michelin XiceXi2 (one winter so far) for the season. No complaints, except for the look of going from 19x9 to 16x6.5 (super inboard in the rear).

Pros: no complaints
Cons: look of smaller tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
MICHELIN Tires

My first set of marketed LRR tires were Michelin Energy MXV4+ on my MKIV Golf. Admittedly they were great tires in dry and wet until they had some miles on them and went to hell in a handbasket.

Pros: great tires in dry and wet
Cons: went to hell in a handbasket
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
khaug
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

Our egg came with Wranglers. They were so noisy and rode so harshly that I replaced them with Bridgestone Dueler Alenzas at 800 miles. Love the new Bridgestones!

Cons: noisy, rode harshly
Mileage: 800 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...