Tires Kumho or BFGoodrich

BFGoodrich Tires
THELOSERSWINAGAIN
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

My KO2s were 5 or 6 years old with plenty of tread left. I stuck with BFG because I get plenty of miles out of them and I have no complaints from the KO2.

Pros: long lasting, good mileage
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

I switched from the stock Goodyear tires to E-rated BFG KO2 on my 2015 F150. There is a small but noticeable loss of quickness that you get used to. I also lost 2-3 mpg on the highway. I gained much better flat protection.

Pros: better flat protection
Cons: loss of quickness, lost mpg
Vehicle: Ford
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
nomad2284
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.5

The traction is one aspect but proven durability off road is hard to put a value on. K02s have eaten some ugly road.

Pros: proven off-road durability, good traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires
Genghis-Ron-
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

2k miles in and I love them. 1-1.5mpg decrease from the stock OEM tires.

Pros: love them
Cons: 1-1.5mpg decrease
Vehicle: Toyota
Mileage: 3219 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
Jakester4554
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 3.0

Hey all, would just like to share my experience with the solus ha32 4 season by kumho. These tires were installed at 173,000km last September and currently have 188,000km… around 15,000km give or take 10,000 miles in all types of weather. They are nearing end of life already.. thoughts? Overall they do ok in the snow but arent amazing. Noise isnt horrible, but the wear holy man this is crazy. I had the front suspension replaced as well as an alignment on the day of tire installation.

Pros: do ok in snow
Cons: fast wear, not amazing
Mileage: 15000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

The Phantoms are a decent tire for the price. They're a Discount Tire brand but manufactured by Kumho. I'd personally recommend the Phantom because both tires are fairly equal but those are cheaper. That being said they're both not particularly good. They'll get the job done and that's about it.

Pros: decent tire for price
Cons: not particularly good
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
Eliteman76
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.0

the kumho tires ours came with from the factory lasted to around 50-55,000 miles. I’m disappointed I was stupid enough to not rotate them, and paid the price because oddly, front tires were perfect. Both rear tires are absolutely blasted after around 45,000 miles give or take. Severe cupping to the point I swear both tires had bad belts.

Pros: lasted 50-55k miles
Cons: severe cupping, blasted rear tires
Vehicle: Kia Soul
Mileage: 80467 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

My experience with Kumho was once the top layer of the tire wore off (e.g. after a year), performance of the tire degraded. They must use a cheaper rubber underneath.

Cons: performance degraded after wear
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 76

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...