Tires Kumho or BFGoodrich

Kumho Tires

Swapped the 21’s and summer tires off my summit reserve for 18” XDs and Kumho Venture with a 3 peak mountain snowflake rating. Had 10” of snow and didn’t bat an eye in snow mode.

Pros: didn’t bat an eye
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I got 275 and use to have pirellis now I got kumhos they don’t spin as much as the pirellis from a straight dig I use to fish tail hard when my foot was deep in the pedal I recommend kumhos and falkens they straight

Pros: don’t spin as much
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
lepickle
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

Try kumho tires korean brand and decent quality for its price, for my sedan its about 2.8k per tire

Pros: decent quality for price
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
Shmoke_n_Shniff
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

On my last car Michelin Pilot Sport 4S lasted ~20k but that's kind of expected due to how soft they are. On my current I have Kumho Ecsta Sport and they have lasted about the same but instead of wear being the issue they're cracking/tearing.

Cons: cracking/tearing
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

I absolutely hate using the KO2's. They're a long lasting tire with a high load rating, but that's because the rubber compound is hard as steel. They're outright dangerous in wet and icy conditions.

Pros: long lasting tire
Cons: dangerous in wet/icy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BFGoodrich Tires

Worn KO2s are known to have lots of siping, but for some reason the siping doesn\u2019t go all the way down and they\u2019re known for getting pretty bad in the wet/snow vs some other off road tires.

Pros: lots of siping
Cons: bad in wet/snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 76

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...