Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ IRONMAN ➔ COMFORSER

Tires IRONMAN or COMFORSER

Reviews
All
IRONMAN
COMFORSER
IRONMAN › Tires
Advanced_Policy731
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

I'm in ironman gen 2 from tire discounters all 4, i got all the tires and the mount and a alignment and balancing for like 400$ bucks with the deal they run. And a free oil change. But the ironmans have done me well they did good in rain and snow and i haven't exactly been nice to them, handled potholes too.

Pros: good in rain and snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
Ok_Tackle_1320
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

An ultra-high-performance all-season tire, the iMove Gen 3 A/S from Ironman is designed for use on sport and performance-oriented coupes and sedans. Built with large shoulders that improve cornering and handling, the iMove Gen 3 A/S features an all-season rubber compound that allows for solid traction in dry, wet, and light winter weather conditions.

Pros: solid traction, quiet ride
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
backinblackandblue
  • Grip:
Rating 4.5

I thought they must be crap but after looking into them, they are very well-reviewed. A traction A temp, UHP (ultra-high performance) rated. I like them. You could pay $400/tire for a premium brand but they won't be 4 times better or last 4 times longer.

Pros: very well-reviewed, traction A temp, UHP rated, good value
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
Tin_Can_739
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Ironman and milemaker are the last two sets and they lasted about 75% of what a premium brand would.

Cons: shorter lifespan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
Trouble_River
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 2.5

Money forced my hand a couple summers back and I had to put new front tires on my Grand Marquis at the time. Had to go cheap and bought Ironman iMove all seasons. After a few months the only positives on the ledger were that a) they had tread and b) oddly, they balanced out unbelievably well. 80 MPH on the highway, smooth as glass. Ride and handling quality deteriorated quickly from new and they got loud in a hurry.

Pros: balanced well, smooth at speed
Cons: deteriorated quickly, got loud
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
Robjla
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

This tire is new Iron Man. This is the second chunk missing; the other tire was replaced under warranty. It’s new, maybe 2 months old.

Cons: chunks missing, warranty replacement
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
eagledrummer2
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

I too just replaced half worn ironman tires with dws's on a car I just bought. Wet grip on the ironman was some of the worst I'd ever experienced on a tire with tread still on it.

Cons: worst wet grip
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — IRONMAN or COMFORSER?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires IRONMAN and COMFORSER
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — COMFORSER or IRONMAN?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires IRONMAN were overall better than COMFORSER.

  1. IRONMAN received a PR Score of 66 out of 100, and COMFORSER scored 59 points.
  2. IRONMAN ranked 39 in the overall ranking, and COMFORSER ranked 57.
  3. The average rating is higher for IRONMAN (3.2) than for COMFORSER (3.1).
  4. Tires IRONMAN have better feature ratings than COMFORSER:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for COMFORSER is better than IRONMAN.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for COMFORSER is outperforms IRONMAN.
    • Grip - reviews suggest, that this property for COMFORSER is preferred to IRONMAN.

Which tires are more popular — IRONMAN or COMFORSER?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires IRONMAN were overall more popular than COMFORSER.

By vote balance, tires IRONMAN surpassed COMFORSER:

  • For IRONMAN, the ratio of positive (54) to negative (27) votes is 27 votes.
  • For COMFORSER, the ratio of positive (19) to negative (13) votes is 6 votes.

By number of reviews, tires IRONMAN surpassed COMFORSER:

  • For tires IRONMAN there are 25 reviews: 14 positive, 6 neutral, 5 negative.
  • For tires COMFORSER there are 10 reviews: 5 positive, 2 neutral, 3 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — IRONMAN or COMFORSER?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires IRONMAN and COMFORSER have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires IRONMAN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

Also available: comparisons of tires COMFORSER with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›