Got it
We use cookies to collect statistics and improve your experience. Learn more.
Spare parts reviews ➔ All comparisons ➔ IRONMAN ➔ Barum

Tires IRONMAN or Barum

Reviews
All
IRONMAN
Barum
Barum › Tires
Gu733
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

Le avevo 4 stagioni sulla Fiat punto del 2008, la mia prima auto.

Mi sono trovato molto bene, l'ho tenuta dal 2019 al 2022, sono andato anche sulla neve in montagna, in nevicata piena, e ho avuto zero problemi.

Pros: Mi sono trovato bene
Cons: Poi ho grippato
Vehicle: Fiat Punto
Mileage: 75000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
Advanced_Policy731
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

I'm in ironman gen 2 from tire discounters all 4, i got all the tires and the mount and a alignment and balancing for like 400$ bucks with the deal they run. And a free oil change. But the ironmans have done me well they did good in rain and snow and i haven't exactly been nice to them, handled potholes too.

Pros: good in rain and snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Barum › Tires
qberserkr
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

Avute per 4 anni su una c3. Uso misto, in ordine: collina, citt\u00e0, autostrada a velocit\u00e0 sostenuta.

In inverno nevica poco da me, ma le abbiamo testate un paio di settimane fa (vecchie di 4 anni) e siamo usciti senza problemi dal vialetto sterrato e innevato.

Pros: si sono comportate bene
Vehicle: Citroen C3
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Barum › Tires
vargemp
  • Grip:
Rating 5.0

I got new Barums for this winter and they’re doing absolutely fine (also on a Golf). Recently done 110 on snowed highway while everyone else was in the right lane doing like 80 and they felt perfectly stable. On wet road they also seem to do well.

Pros: perfectly stable, do well
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
Ok_Tackle_1320
  • Grip:
Rating 4.0

An ultra-high-performance all-season tire, the iMove Gen 3 A/S from Ironman is designed for use on sport and performance-oriented coupes and sedans. Built with large shoulders that improve cornering and handling, the iMove Gen 3 A/S features an all-season rubber compound that allows for solid traction in dry, wet, and light winter weather conditions.

Pros: solid traction, quiet ride
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
Tin_Can_739
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Ironman and milemaker are the last two sets and they lasted about 75% of what a premium brand would.

Cons: shorter lifespan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN › Tires
Robjla
  • Grip:
Rating 1.0

This tire is new Iron Man. This is the second chunk missing; the other tire was replaced under warranty. It’s new, maybe 2 months old.

Cons: chunks missing, warranty replacement
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
VS

Tires MICHELIN or Continental

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Pirelli

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Falken

VS

Tires MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Goodyear

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Nokia

VS

Tires MICHELIN or Hankook

VS

Tires MICHELIN or YOKOHAMA

Show all

Which tires to choose — IRONMAN or Barum?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires IRONMAN and Barum
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — Barum or IRONMAN?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Barum were overall better than IRONMAN.

  1. IRONMAN received a PR Score of 66 out of 100, and Barum scored 77 points.
  2. IRONMAN ranked 39 in the overall ranking, and Barum ranked 40.
  3. The average rating is higher for Barum (3.5) than for IRONMAN (3.2).
  4. Tires Barum have better feature ratings than IRONMAN:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for Barum is better than IRONMAN.
    • Ride comfort - drivers claim, that this property for Barum is outperforms IRONMAN.
    • Grip - reviews suggest, that this property for Barum is preferred to IRONMAN.

Which tires are more popular — IRONMAN or Barum?

Tires IRONMAN and Barum were equally popular according to data in March 2026.

By vote balance, tires Barum surpassed IRONMAN:

  • For IRONMAN, the ratio of positive (54) to negative (27) votes is 27 votes.
  • For Barum, the ratio of positive (47) to negative (14) votes is 33 votes.

By number of reviews, tires IRONMAN surpassed Barum:

  • For tires IRONMAN there are 25 reviews: 14 positive, 6 neutral, 5 negative.
  • For tires Barum there are 20 reviews: 15 positive, 1 neutral, 4 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — IRONMAN or Barum?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires IRONMAN and Barum have not taken top places in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding your review about these manufacturers.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires IRONMAN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

Also available: comparisons of tires Barum with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...
›