Tires Firestone or IRONMAN

Firestone Tires

I had a set of Indy500; they performed well for a UHP for the price, but definitely noticeable difference with the set of Conti ExtremeContact Sport 02s that replaced them.

Pros: performed well for price
Cons: noticeable difference
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
icenver
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.5

General G-Max RS or Firestone Indy 500s are solid options aswell with good grip and way friendlier pricing. I ran Indy 500s on my old Camaro and they felt great in normal driving without being loud or sketchy in the rain.

Pros: good grip, friendlier pricing
Cons: not loud or sketchy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

Those are good tires but way too heavy at 44lbs vs 24lbs for stock tires.They will kill your mileage and performance. I went with Firestone destination at2 in 235/65 r17. Only a few pounds more (28lbs) than stock and they perform great!

Pros: perform great
Cons: way too heavy
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

Decided on Firestone Affinity. Firestone's higher level brand, Bridgestone's research and development has trickled down to the Affinity AS tires. You can save some money by avoiding the Bridgestones. But 6 months in, with the amount of snow in Chicago this winter, all I can say is I haven't regretted my choice whatsoever.

Pros: no regrets, good in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires

I'm in ironman gen 2 from tire discounters all 4, i got all the tires and the mount and a alignment and balancing for like 400$ bucks with the deal they run. And a free oil change. But the ironmans have done me well they did good in rain and snow and i haven't exactly been nice to them, handled potholes too.

Pros: good in rain and snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

I had a 1999 Explorer and had it at the dealer for an oil change. While it was there word came down from Ford: if it\u2019s an Explorer with Firestone tires, switch to Goodyear! So, for about $40 I got an oil change and 5 new tires (including the spare). Best deal I ever got on a car!

Pros: best deal on car
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
IRONMAN Tires
Tin_Can_739
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Ironman and milemaker are the last two sets and they lasted about 75% of what a premium brand would.

Cons: shorter lifespan
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires

I went to them for new tires on my Hyundai, my car had 96k on the originals, the wear was even and they still had decent tread. Guess what, they said I needed alignment.

Pros: even tire wear
Cons: unnecessary alignment
Vehicle: Hyundai
Mileage: 96000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Firestone Tires
w1ck3d_ham
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 1.0

I had the Firestone AT years ago on a Ranger. Complete trash! Didn’t last for shit & barely any off-road traction.

Pros: none
Cons: complete trash
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 35

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons

Which tires to choose — Firestone or IRONMAN?

If choosing tires across many manufacturers, check the part ranking. If your choice is down to two brands, the PartReview part comparisons help.

We compare tires across these categories:

Comparison of tires Firestone and IRONMAN
  1. PR Score.
  2. Overall ranking.
  3. Vote balance.
  4. Average rating.
  5. Number of reviews.
  6. Feature ratings.
  7. Car owners’ choice.

Which tires are better — IRONMAN or Firestone?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Firestone were overall better than IRONMAN.

  1. Firestone received a PR Score of 79 out of 100, and IRONMAN scored 66 points.
  2. Firestone ranked 15 in the overall ranking, and IRONMAN ranked 39.
  3. The average rating is higher for Firestone (3.9) than for IRONMAN (3.2).
  4. Tires Firestone have better feature ratings than IRONMAN:
    • Noise - owners believe, that this property for Firestone is better than IRONMAN.
    • Grip - drivers claim, that this property for Firestone is outperforms IRONMAN.
    • Ride comfort - reviews suggest, that this property for Firestone is preferred to IRONMAN.

Which tires are more popular — Firestone or IRONMAN?

In March 2026 on PartReview, tires Firestone were overall more popular than IRONMAN.

By vote balance, tires Firestone surpassed IRONMAN:

  • For Firestone, the ratio of positive (785) to negative (197) votes is 588 votes.
  • For IRONMAN, the ratio of positive (54) to negative (27) votes is 27 votes.

By number of reviews, tires Firestone surpassed IRONMAN:

  • For tires Firestone there are 320 reviews: 245 positive, 25 neutral, 49 negative.
  • For tires IRONMAN there are 25 reviews: 14 positive, 6 neutral, 5 negative.

Which tires do car owners prefer — Firestone or IRONMAN?

In March 2026, according to PartReview, tires Firestone led more car-specific ratings than IRONMAN:

Firestone are chosen by owners of cars such as: Subaru BRZ, and others.

Tires IRONMAN have not yet taken leading positions in car-specific ratings. You can help by adding a review and specifying your car.

Other comparisons of tires

If this comparison didn’t fully answer your question, there are many others on PartReview.

For example, comparisons of tires Firestone with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

Also available: comparisons of tires IRONMAN with: MICHELIN, Continental, Pirelli, Falken, BRIDGESTONE, Goodyear, Nokia, Hankook, YOKOHAMA, Toyo.

You can also see who is better among other tires manufacturers: MICHELIN or Continental, MICHELIN or Pirelli, MICHELIN or Falken, MICHELIN or BRIDGESTONE, MICHELIN or Goodyear.

Loading...