Tires Falken or Nokia

Nokia Tires

I personally use Nokian winter tires. I've had the others, but keep coming back to the Nokians. Studded tires are unwelcome on the highway for me as they are loud and will add to driver fatigue over longer trips. Two hours of studded tire noise would drive me insane!

Pros: prefer Nokian, good quality
Cons: loud, driver fatigue
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires
tatecg
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I’ve had 22” Nokians on my R1S for 8,000 miles, and noticed no difference in efficiency. I *have* noticed (as have others) that they have significantly more tread than the stock Pirellis at this same point. Given their cost, any increase in “fuel” costs due to worse efficiency (if that is a thing) will probably be more than made up for by the lower cost of the tires, and the (likely) longer useable life.

Pros: no efficiency difference, more tread, lower cost, longer life
Mileage: 12875 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

For my current car, I got the Falken Wildpeak A/T Trail tires. They have the 3 mountain peak emblem so they're rated for snow. Have had them for close to 2 weeks and so far, so good.

Pros: rated for snow, good performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

I have dailyed falken 660's, and re71r's (the old version) and would just go through a set a year. When they are done you can tell a difference when it rains and will slip very easily at stoplight.

Cons: slip very easily
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

Bought these Nokian One tires brand new less than 2 years ago. DOT code shows they were manufactured 2 years ago.

Mechanic says it's dry rot and I need to replace them in a few months max.

Cons: dry rot, replace soon
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ... 163

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...