Tires Falken or BRIDGESTONE

BRIDGESTONE Tires

I got Blizzaks last winter and they’ve been amazing. Last year I drove across MI (5 hours) in a severe snowstorm warning (1ft+ snow) and a snow squall warning. I must have passed close to 100 cars/trucks in ditches. I never felt unsafe traction wise, I was planted. My Dad also had them on his old Charger 392 years ago and we took it ice fishing. Since then i’ve loved Blizzaks.

Pros: amazing traction, planted feel, safe in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
capkirk123
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
Rating 4.0

I bought my miata with some pretty thrashed Falken Azeni RT615Ks on them and they grip pretty good, and even with the tread worn down to the wear bars they're not completely terrifying in the wet.

Pros: grip pretty good
Cons: terrifying in the wet
Vehicle: Mazda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

As someone who has a 04 2wd I can tell you best thing is a good set of tires. I run Falken Wildpeak AT4W's 265 65 17 we have decent snows in the winter I just lower the air pressure and go on my merry way.

Pros: decent snows in winter
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
Chance_Shock4760
  • Grip:
  • Noise:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 4.0

so far they’re quiet, grippy under wet conditions & slightly better in handling & ride than the Dunlop Grandtrek that came with them. Haven’t driven them in snow yet…

Pros: quiet, grippy wet conditions, better handling, better ride
Cons: not tested in snow yet
Vehicle: Lexus
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Blizzaks are the best for snow, x-ice are the best for ice. Depends on how you drive. If you’re late breaking all the time then you want x-ice for better braking grip, if you drive slow in the winter and plan your stops then blizzaks will have better acceleration traction.

Pros: better braking grip, acceleration traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires
FartFactory92
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.5

I have 33" Load C AT4Ws, and they have been awesome both on and off road. ...the gas mileage really takes a hit with the heavier tires and I can tell my suspension has a tougher time controlling them.

Pros: awesome on road, awesome off-road
Cons: poor gas mileage, tough on suspension
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Falken Tires

2025 forester with 3200 miles on the falken tires. I have already had 2 instances of road damage. First a sheet metal screw in the tread and now a puncture and tear on the inner sidewall due to a piece of gravel.

Pros: low mileage
Cons: road damage, sidewall tear
Mileage: 3200 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I came here to see if it was just me and nope! At 30k miles I’m at 5/32. No way these will go to 70k. I’m going back to Michelin

Cons: wears very quickly
Mileage: 48280 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 ... 184

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...