Tires BRIDGESTONE or Nokia

Nokia Tires

Studded all the way! Had Hakkas on my RAV4 and they made such a difference. They can save your life on black ice.

Pros: made such a difference
Cons: slide on dry asphalt
Vehicle: Toyota
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

If this is your first time, yes get some studded tires, something like a Hakkapelitta.

Pros: good for new drivers
Cons: loud, studs wear
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

We drive a FWD minivan or a RWD truck - both with good winter tires, Michelin X-ice on the minivan, Nokian Hakkapeliitta LT3 non-studded on the truck.

Pros: good winter tires
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I have Nokian Hakkapelitta studded tires and they\u2019ve been amazing the last 2 years living in Banff and I have a RWD car, drove to Calgary and back plenty of times, in snow storms and have driven to Jasper and BC in the winter with no issues.

Pros: amazing, no issues
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I recently replaced my worn out stock tires (the OEM low rolling resistant EV friendly ones) on my ‘22 Bolt EV 2LT with Bridgestone Weatherpeak 215/50R17’s mainly due to a sale at Costco Tires. I wanted the snowpeak rating as winter is upon us. However, my efficiency dropped dramatically since, going from an average of 4.5 miles per KWh (even in the dead of winter averaging 30 degrees F) to around 3.1 miles

Cons: efficiency dropped dramatically
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

They are garbo. I got 30k out of my turanzas before I had to get new ones. I went with the Michilin Cross Climate 2. Totally worth it.

Pros: Totally worth it
Cons: garbo, only 30k miles
Mileage: 30000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 ... 162

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...