Tires BRIDGESTONE or Nokia

Nokia Tires

Posesor de Nokian de iarna, de peste 5 ani. Cele mai bune cauciucuri de iarna parerea mea, rezista calumea la orice fel de test, eu folosindu-le pe tractiune spate, n am avut emotii vreodata.

Pros: best winter tires, withstand tests, no worries
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Bought a set of Blizzak WS90s two years ago and they have tons of tread left after two seasons. Wear obviously depends on how you drive, but mine have held up great for regular commuting and trips to the valley. Very good at handling deep snow, never got stuck.

Pros: excellent tread life, durable, very good in deep snow, never got stuck
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

The Blizzaks always performed better, in my experience, and my WS90s have lasted just fine. I’m not sure how they’d be considered bad on dry roads, can’t say I’ve had any issues.

Pros: superior performance, good longevity, no issues on dry roads
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

I’ve got blizzaks on both vehicles. Only ran generic winter tires before that and the improvement was crazy.

Pros: significant improvement, excellent performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

The Bridgestone A005 is less highly regarded in the snow and more for wet and cold (i.e Scotland), but both are miles and miles clear of a summer tyre in the snow.

Pros: good for wet, cold
Cons: poor snow performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Nokia Tires

I just had a set of four of the same Nokian tires replaced after only 2 years and 10,000 miles. They're terrible tires.

Cons: terrible tires
Mileage: 16093 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 ... 162

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...