Tires BRIDGESTONE or Kumho

BRIDGESTONE Tires

The stones have been a cheater tire for me in a sense that they communicate so well, they handle abuse of inputs, when they give up grip, they’re very gradual and you feel a slide coming. And when you do lose traction, the slide is controllable to get back into grip. There’s a reason they’re at the spear tip of auto cross.

Pros: good communication, handles abuse, gradual grip loss, controllable slide
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Bridgestone does everything really well (except snow) and have been the tires that Ive bought repeatedly to cut out the guesswork.

Pros: does everything well, bought repeatedly
Cons: poor in snow
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

Kumho u ranngu premiuma na suhom i mokrom a malo losije na snijegu a jeftinije

Pros: premium na suhom i mokrom, jeftinije
Cons: losije na snijegu
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

The Bridgestone A005 is less highly regarded in the snow and more for wet and cold (i.e Scotland), but both are miles and miles clear of a summer tyre in the snow.

Pros: good for wet, cold
Cons: poor snow performance
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

Bridgestone Potenza RE92 are great on dry pavement; but they are a scary ride with RWD on wet, snowy, or icy pavement.

Pros: great on dry pavement
Cons: scary on wet pavement
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

I think it’s gotta be the Kumho all seasons I have on my DD right now, they have absolutely zero grip even on perfectly dry warm roads

Cons: zero grip, dry roads
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ... 134

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...