Tires BRIDGESTONE or Kumho

BRIDGESTONE Tires

Blizzak is the king for studless snow traction, I think Michelin X-Ice is a little better on ice, Continental VikingContact is another great option for a little less $$$. I'm currently on Vredestein Wintrac+ (something like that) and they're fine.

Pros: good snow traction
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires

Swapped the 21’s and summer tires off my summit reserve for 18” XDs and Kumho Venture with a 3 peak mountain snowflake rating. Had 10” of snow and didn’t bat an eye in snow mode.

Pros: didn’t bat an eye
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
LateExplorer3780
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 5.0

I\u2019ve had the Bridgestone S23 and they lastet 3k miles. Best 3k miles I\u2019ve ridden but def not the best mileage.

Pros: best miles ridden
Cons: not best mileage
Mileage: 4828 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires

After switching to Bridgestone Weatherpeak All-Weather tires i get 8.1 as the lowest. 29-30MPG.

Pros: good fuel economy
Cons: lower MPG in winter
Vehicle: Honda
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
Kumho Tires
Shmoke_n_Shniff
  • Grip:
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

On my last car Michelin Pilot Sport 4S lasted ~20k but that's kind of expected due to how soft they are. On my current I have Kumho Ecsta Sport and they have lasted about the same but instead of wear being the issue they're cracking/tearing.

Cons: cracking/tearing
Mileage: 20000 km
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
BRIDGESTONE Tires
Humbugwombat
  • Ride comfort:
Rating 3.0

Your best mileage will come from a low rolling resistance tire. I use Ecopias by Bridgestone. I had Weatherpeaks on before that and had noticeably worse fuel efficiency (8-10 mpg difference.)

Pros: best mileage, low resistance
Cons: worse fuel efficiency
Comment
Is this review helpful?
source
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 134

Write your review

Help others - share your experience with this part.

Other comparisons
Loading...